Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Multi-Chamber Reverse Remodeling and Hemodynamic Force Realignment After SGLT2 Inhibitor Initiation in Real-World Heart Failure.

Journal of cardiovascular development and disease·2026
Same author

Extracorporeal life support in lung transplantation with dual-lumen cannulas: A systematic review.

Perfusion·2026
Same author

Carcinoid Heart Disease: The Role of Echocardiography in Raising the First Suspicion.

Journal of clinical medicine·2026
Same author

Evaluation of Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebral Autoregulation Using Synthetic Data and In Silico Modeling.

CNS neuroscience & therapeutics·2026
Same author

SOCCER<sub>Index</sub>: An Estimate of Recreational Soccer Players' Physical Ability by Health Status and Lifestyle Habits.

Sports (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Venopulmonary extracorporeal life support: An Extracorporeal Life Support Organization registry analysis.

The Journal of heart and lung transplantation : the official publication of the International Society for Heart Transplantation·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

3.3K

IABP versus Impella Support in Cardiogenic Shock: "In Silico" Study.

Beatrice De Lazzari1, Massimo Capoccia2,3, Roberto Badagliacca4

  • 1Human Movement and Sport Sciences, "Foro Italico" University of Rome, 00147 Rome, Italy.

Journal of Cardiovascular Development and Disease
|April 27, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This study compared Impella and Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) support for cardiogenic shock using a cardiovascular simulator. The Impella device demonstrated a greater reduction in left ventricular volumes and workload compared to IABP.

Keywords:
CARDIOSIM©IABPImpellacardiogenic shockcardiovascular modellingchronic heart failurelumped parameter modelsoftware simulationventricular elastance

More Related Videos

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

21.6K
Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
07:39

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: August 16, 2021

3.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock
06:10

Utilizing Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Devices in Acute Myocardial Infarction Complicated by Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: June 12, 2021

3.3K
The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump
06:13

The Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump

Published on: February 5, 2021

21.6K
Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock
07:39

Use of a Percutaneous Ventricular Assist Device/Left Atrium to Femoral Artery Bypass System for Cardiogenic Shock

Published on: August 16, 2021

3.7K

Area of Science:

  • Cardiology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Simulation

Background:

  • Cardiogenic shock (CS) is a critical condition characterized by severe hypotension and inadequate organ perfusion due to acute left ventricular failure.
  • Mechanical circulatory support devices like Intra-Aortic Balloon Pump (IABP) and Impella pumps are crucial for managing CS.
  • Comparative analysis of these devices is essential for optimizing patient outcomes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy of Impella 2.5 pump versus IABP in supporting patients with cardiogenic shock.
  • To evaluate hemodynamic and energetic variable changes during assistance with both devices using a cardiovascular simulator.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized the CARDIOSIM© cardiovascular system simulator for virtual patient simulations.
  • Simulated baseline cardiogenic shock conditions, followed by assistance with IABP (synchronized mode) and Impella 2.5 (various rotational speeds).
  • Calculated percentage variations in hemodynamic and energetic variables relative to baseline during both IABP and Impella assistance.

Main Results:

  • Impella 2.5 at 50,000 rpm increased total flow by 4.36% and reduced left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) by 15-30%.
  • Both IABP and Impella assistance reduced left ventricular end-systolic volume (LVESV), with IABP showing a reduction of 10-18% and Impella 12-33%.
  • Impella assistance resulted in a greater reduction in LVESV, LVEDV, left ventricular external work, and left atrial pressure-volume loop area compared to IABP.

Conclusions:

  • Simulation suggests Impella 2.5 offers superior hemodynamic support in cardiogenic shock compared to IABP.
  • Impella demonstrates a more significant reduction in ventricular volumes and workload, indicating potentially better cardiac recovery.
  • CARDIOSIM© provides a valuable platform for in-silico comparative analysis of mechanical circulatory support devices.