Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors01:17

Common Leveling Mistakes and Errors

105
A survey team is tasked with determining the elevation difference between points Point A and Point B, separated by uneven terrain. They use a leveling instrument and a leveling rod.Common MistakesMisreading the Rod: During a backsight reading at Point A, the instrumentman observes the rod partially obscured by tall grass. Instead of reading 1.135 m, they mistakenly record 1.735 m due to the misalignment of the crosshair with the wrong graduation. This error adds 0.600 m to all subsequent...
105
Errors in Global Positioning System01:26

Errors in Global Positioning System

77
Global Positioning System (GPS) technology has revolutionized navigation and positioning, but its accuracy is often compromised by various errors. These errors, stemming from environmental, satellite, and receiver-related factors, require careful mitigation to ensure reliable performance across applications.Atmospheric ErrorsGPS signals travel through the Earth’s ionosphere and troposphere, introducing delays which affect accuracy. The ionosphere is strongly influenced by charged particles,...
77
Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling01:26

Influence of Earth's Curvature and Atmospheric Refraction on Leveling

165
During leveling, the Earth's curvature and atmospheric refraction introduce deviations in the line of sight from a true horizontal reference. When the line of sight is leveled, it remains perpendicular to the plumb line only at a single point. Beyond this, it deviates due to the Earth’s curvature, represented by the correction C. For a sight distance D, the deviation can be derived using the relationship:This relationship shows that the deviation increases quadratically with distance.
165
Distance Corrections01:15

Distance Corrections

55
To achieve precise distance measurements, especially in surveying and construction, certain corrections must be applied to account for potential sources of error like the standardization errors, temperature variations, and slope adjustments.Standardization error emerges when measurement equipment undergoes changes, such as wear, repairs, or weather impacts. To address this, surveyors compare the equipment’s readings to a standard. This process identifies any deviation that might lead to...
55

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Cold-stimulated browning graft fat enhances burn wound recovery through accelerating DAMP-ADSC activation.

Journal of tissue engineering·2026
Same author

Supervisor psychological closeness and employees' taking charge at work: a moderated mediated model based on trust in supervisor and employee power distance orientation.

Frontiers in psychology·2026
Same author

Tracking the spatiotemporal journey of chitosan nanoparticles across ear physiological barriers: Mechanisms and pathways.

Drug metabolism and disposition: the biological fate of chemicals·2026
Same author

Enhanced Doppler tomography LiDAR imaging using the MACE framework and deep denoisers.

Optics express·2026
Same author

Glycyrrhizic acid and its carrier-free micellar formulation: Unraveling the potential for enhanced oral prevention of hearing loss.

International journal of pharmaceutics: X·2025
Same author

Cinnamic acid-GPR109A pathway improves skeletal muscle hypertrophy and metabolism.

Phytomedicine : international journal of phytotherapy and phytopharmacology·2025
Same journal

RETRACTED: Zhang et al. A Novel Framework for Reconstruction and Imaging of Target Scattering Centers via Wide-Angle Incidence in Radar Networks. <i>Sensors</i> 2025, <i>25</i>, 6802.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Enhancing Unsupervised Multi-Source Domain Adaptation for Person Re-Identification via Mixture of Experts and Graph-Based Relation.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development of an Instrumented Glove for Palmar Pressure Assessment in Kayakers.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Development and Experimental Validation of an Autonomous IoT-Based Monitoring System for Real-Time Water Quality Assessment in the Amazon River.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Semi-Supervised Adversarial Learning Framework for Controller Area Network Bus Intrusion Detection.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same journal

Smart Optimization Method for Safety Signs in Innovative Manufacturing Environments Integrating Industrial Field IoT Sensors and Knowledge Graphs.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
10:35

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

19.5K

Pointing Error Correction for a Moving-Platform Electro-Optical Telescope Using an Optimized Parameter Model.

Yan He1,2,3,4, Yahui Zhang1,3,4, Xiaohua Feng5

  • 1Institute of Optics and Electronics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Chengdu 610209, China.

Sensors (Basel, Switzerland)
|April 28, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

A new model improves pointing accuracy for moving-platform electro-optical telescopes (MPEOTs) by analyzing error sources and applying optimized parameters. This enhanced model significantly outperforms the standard mount model in real-world tests.

Keywords:
error correctionmoving-platform electro-optical telescopeoptimized parameter modelpointing error

More Related Videos

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K
A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

15.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Aug 1, 2025

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO
10:35

Bringing the Visible Universe into Focus with Robo-AO

Published on: February 12, 2013

19.5K
Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques
09:01

Gain-compensation Methodology for a Sinusoidal Scan of a Galvanometer Mirror in Proportional-Integral-Differential Control Using Pre-emphasis Techniques

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.7K
A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking
10:16

A Protocol for Real-time 3D Single Particle Tracking

Published on: January 3, 2018

15.0K

Area of Science:

  • Optical Engineering
  • Aerospace Engineering
  • Control Systems

Background:

  • Moving-platform electro-optical telescopes (MPEOTs) face significant pointing accuracy challenges due to platform instability and system errors.
  • Accurate target acquisition and tracking are critical for MPEOTs in various applications, including surveillance and remote sensing.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To develop and validate a novel optimized parameter model for enhancing the pointing accuracy of MPEOTs.
  • To systematically analyze and mitigate error sources affecting MPEOT pointing performance.

Main Methods:

  • Comprehensive analysis of error sources in both the telescope and platform navigation systems.
  • Establishment of a linear pointing correction model based on target positioning.
  • Application of stepwise regression to derive an optimized parameter model and address multicollinearity.

Main Results:

  • The optimized parameter model demonstrated superior performance compared to the conventional mount model.
  • MPEOTs corrected with the new model achieved pointing errors below 50 arcseconds for extended durations (approx. 23 hours).
  • Experimental tests yielded root-mean-square (RMS) errors for azimuth and elevation within acceptable limits (e.g., azimuth RMS: 14.07″, 12.71″, 28.93″; elevation RMS: 12.94″, 12.73″, 28.30″).

Conclusions:

  • The proposed optimized parameter model effectively enhances the pointing accuracy of MPEOTs.
  • The methodology provides a robust approach to error analysis and correction for dynamic optical systems.
  • This advancement has significant implications for improving the operational capabilities of MPEOTs in demanding environments.