Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 6, 2026
A Model for Perineural Invasion in Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma
Published on: January 5, 2017
Association of Elective Neck Dissection With Survival in cT1N0M0 Floor of Mouth Squamous Cell Carcinoma: A
Tao Li1,2, Xianwang Xiang1, Yi Wang1
1Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of USTC, Division of Life Sciences and Medicine, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei, Anhui, 230001, P.R. China.
Abstract:
BackgroundStudies on neck management of early-stage floor of mouth (FOM) squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are very few and controversial. We aimed to study whether elective neck dissection (END) for patients with clinically stage T1N0M0 (cT1N0M0) FOM SCC is beneficial for survival.MethodsInformation on patients diagnosed with cT1N0M0 FOM SCC between 2004 and 2015 was collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) database. Cox proportional risk models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used for survival analysis and log-rank tests were performed to compare whether overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) differed. Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to eliminate the effect of confounding variables.ResultsThere were 1014 patients with cT1N0M0 FOM SCC. Among them, END group: 455 cases; observation group: 559 cases. COX regression analysis before PSM demonstrated hazard ratio (HR) in the observation group compared to END (OS: 1.108 (.926-1.326), P = .262; CSS: 1.033 (.772-1.382), P = .827). There was no survival difference between END and observation survival before PSM (5-year OS: 71.8% vs. 67.8%, P = .180; 5-year CSS: 84.5% vs. 84.8%, P = .930); the matched results were the same as before PSM.ConclusionObservation may be a more appropriate option compared with END in cT1N0M0 FOM SCC.
