Cardiac resynchronization therapy: present and future
Marco Schiavone1,2, Roberto Arosio1, Simone Valenza1
1Cardiology Unit, Luigi Sacco University Hospital, Via G.B. Grassi 74, Milan 20157, Italy.
Insights
New pacing techniques like left bundle branch area pacing offer alternatives to traditional biventricular pacing for heart failure patients, showing comparable efficacy and improved procedural times.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Electrophysiology
- Medical Devices
Background:
- Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) using biventricular pacing (BVP) is standard for heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block.
- However, BVP is ineffective or unachievable in up to one-third of patients, necessitating alternative approaches.
Purpose of the Study:
- To review the current state and recent advancements in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
- To explore emerging pacing techniques as alternatives to traditional CRT.
Main Methods:
- Review of current literature on cardiac pacing techniques.
- Comparison of efficacy, safety, and procedural aspects of traditional CRT versus novel methods.
- Discussion of leadless pacing technologies.
Main Results:
- Left bundle branch area pacing demonstrates comparable efficacy to traditional CRT with similar short-term complication rates and reduced procedure times.
- Leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing is an emerging option but faces limitations for widespread clinical use.
Conclusions:
- Conduction system pacing, particularly left bundle branch area pacing, presents a promising alternative to BVP for CRT.
- Ongoing innovations aim to overcome limitations of transvenous leads in pacing modalities.
Abstract:
Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) via biventricular pacing (BVP) is a well-established therapy for patients with heart failure with reduced ejection fraction and left bundle branch block, who remain symptomatic despite optimal medical therapy. Despite the long-standing clinical evidence, as well as the familiarity of cardiac electrophysiologists with the implantation technique, CRT via BVP cannot be achieved or may result ineffective in up to one-third of the patients. Therefore, new alternative techniques, such as conduction system pacing and left ventricular pacing, are emerging as potential alternatives to this technique, not only in case of BVP failure, but also as a stand-alone first choice due to several potential advantages over traditional CRT. Specifically, due to its procedural characteristics, left bundle branch area pacing appears to be the most convincing technique, showing comparable efficacy outcomes when compared with traditional CRT, not increasing short-term device-related complications, as well as improving procedural times. However, transvenous leads remain a major limitation of all these pacing modalities. To overcome this limit, a leadless left ventricular endocardial pacing has been developed as an additional tool to achieve a left endocardial activation, although being still associated with non-negligible pitfalls, limiting its current use in clinical practice. This article focuses on the current state and latest progresses in cardiac resynchronization therapy.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiomyopathy II: Dilated Cardiomyopathy
Heart Failure VI: Adjunct Therapies
Cardiomyopathy V: Interprofessional Care
Dysrhythmias VI: Management of Dysrhythmias
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Heart Failure I: Introduction


