Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

06:48
The HoneyComb Paradigm for Research on Collective Human Behavior
Published on: January 19, 2019
9.4K
Learning rules of engagement for social exchange within and between groups
Michael Rojek-Giffin1, Maël Lebreton2,3, Jean Daunizeau4,5
1Institute for Psychology, Social, Economic and Organisational Psychology, Leiden University, 2333 AK Leiden, the Netherlands.
Summary
Individuals may overpay to reach agreements with different cultural groups, leading to inaccurate beliefs about fairness norms. This research explores cross-cultural negotiation and economic decision-making.
Area of Science:
- Behavioral Economics
- Cross-Cultural Psychology
- Neuroeconomics
Background:
- Globalized economies require cross-cultural negotiation, yet differing fairness norms can cause conflict.
- Individuals often lack insight into partners' perceptions of fairness, leading to misunderstandings.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how individuals decipher and adapt to distinct cultural rules in negotiation.
- To model and test the behavioral and neural mechanisms underlying cross-cultural agreement.
Main Methods:
- Bayesian learning models incorporating inequality aversion were developed.
- Preregistered behavioral experiments (N=420) and neuroimaging studies (N=49) were conducted.
Main Results:
- Individuals exhibited overly generous behavior in ultimatum bargaining with partners from different cultural groups.
- This generosity led to biased beliefs about the norms of other groups.
Conclusions:
- Seeking equitable agreements can result in over-generosity and misperceptions of fairness norms in cross-cultural interactions.
- Understanding these biases is crucial for effective global economic engagement.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K
The Stanford Prison Experiment
23.3K
The famous and controversial Stanford Prison Experiment, conducted by social psychologist Philip Zimbardo and his colleagues at Stanford University, demonstrated the power of social roles, social norms, and scripts.
23.3K
Robbers Cave
14.3K
During the 1950s, the landmark Robbers Cave experiment demonstrated that when groups must compete with one another, intergroup conflict, hostility, and even violence may result. At the Oklahoman summer camp, two troops of boys—termed the Rattlers and the Eagles—took part in a week-long tournament. During this time, their negativity culminated in derogatory name-calling, fistfights, and even vandalism and destruction of property. However, this work also revealed that such tension...
14.3K
Social Proof
27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K
Social Scripts
9.5K
People tend to know what behavior is expected of them in specific, familiar settings. A script is a person’s knowledge about the sequence of events expected in a specific setting (Schank & Abelson, 1977). Essentially, scripts are a particular kind of schema, one containing default values for the features within an event. In the restaurant example, the script's features include the props (e.g., tables, menu, food, and money), the roles to be played (e.g., customer and waiter),...
9.5K

