Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Method Development for Contactless Resonant Cavity Dielectric Spectroscopic Studies of Cellulosic Paper
Published on: October 4, 2019
My paper has been rejected without review. What do I do now?
Jennifer Cleland1, Patricia O'Sullivan2, Ayelet Kuper3
1Lee Kong Chian School of Medicine, Nanyang Technological University, Singapore, Singapore. jennifer.cleland@ntu.edu.sg.
Abstract:
This column is intended to address the kinds of knotty problems and dilemmas with which many scholars grapple in studying health professions education. In this article, the authors address the question of why papers may be desk rejected (rejected without going out for formal peer review) and describe simple steps for authors to optimize their work so it gets past the desk reject stage.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Review and Preview
Decision Making: Traditional Method
First, a specific claim about the population parameter is decided based on the research question and is stated in a simple form. Further, an opposing statement to this claim is also stated. These statements can act as null and alternative hypotheses, out of which a null hypothesis would be a...
Quantifying and Rejecting Outliers: The Grubbs Test
Hypothesis: Accept or Fail to Reject?
There are two ways to indicate that the null hypothesis is not rejected. 'Accept' the null...
Guidelines for Writing Outcome
Patient outcomes reflect the patient's response to the goal rather than what the nurse aims to achieve. Terminology should be observable and measurable to avoid the reader's interpretation. The desired outcome should be realistic and achievable in the designated care timeframe. Expected outcomes should align with adjunctive therapies. The outcome should enhance care...
Proofreading

