Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
Published on: January 6, 2023
Arthrofibrosis in Robotic Total Knee Arthroplasty: An Investigation Into How Robotic Assistance May Contribute to a
Muzaffar Ali1, Christopher Ferguson, Inderpreet Singh
1From UPMC Pinnacle, Harrisburg, PA (Dr. Ali, Dr. Ferguson, Dr. Phillips, Dr. Singh, Dr. Sadhwani, Dr. Kahan, Dr. Kamson, Dr. Angerett, Dr. Hallock, Dr. Dahl, and Dr. King); the Rubin Institute for Advanced Orthopedics, Baltimore, MD (Dr. Kahan and Dr. Angerett); the University of Maryland Medical Center, Baltimore, MD (Dr. Kahan and Dr. Angerett); the Orthopedic Institute of Pennsylvania, Camp Hill, PA (Dr. Hallock and Dr. Dahl); and the UPMC Arlington Orthopedics, Harrisburg, PA (Dr. King).
Introduction:
Arthrofibrosis after total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can lead to pain and restricted range of motion. Matching native knee kinematics is crucial in avoiding arthrofibrosis postoperatively. However, manual jig-based instruments have demonstrated variability and inaccuracy during primary TKA. Robotic-arm-assisted surgery was developed to increase the precision and accuracy of bone cuts and component alignment. In the literature, limited information on arthrofibrosis after robotic-assisted TKA (RATKA) exists. The purpose of this study was to compare the incidence of arthrofibrosis after manual TKA (mTKA) with RATKA by examining the need for manipulation under anesthesia (MUA) postoperatively and evaluating preoperative and postoperative radiographic parameters.
Methods:
A retrospective analysis of patients who underwent primary TKA from 2019 to 2021 was conducted. Rates of MUA were evaluated and perioperative radiographs were analyzed to determine posterior condylar offset ratio, Insall-Salvati Index, and posterior tibial slope (PTS) in patients who underwent mTKA versus RATKA. Range of motion was recorded for patients who required MUA.
Results:
A total of 1234 patients were included, of which 644 underwent mTKA, and 590 underwent RATKA. Thirty-seven RATKA patients compared with 12 mTKA patients required MUA postoperatively (P < 0.0001). A significant decrease in PTS postoperatively was seen in the RATKA (7.10° ± 2.4° preoperatively versus 2.46° ± 1.2° postoperatively), with a mean decrease of the tibial slope of -4.6° ± 2.5° (P < 0.0001). In patients requiring MUA, a larger decrease was seen in the RATKA group when compared with the mTKA group (mean -5.5 ± 2.0 versus -5.3 ± 0.78, P = 0.6585). No significant difference was seen in the posterior condylar offset ratio and Insall-Salvati Index in both groups.
Discussion:
When conducting RATKA, it is important to match PTS close to the native tibial slope to decrease the incidence of arthrofibrosis postoperatively, as a decrease in PTS can lead to decreased postoperative knee flexion and poor functional outcomes.
