Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

09:32
Development of New Methods for Quantifying Fish Density Using Underwater Stereo-video Tools
Published on: November 20, 2017
9.3K
Evaluating adaptive management frameworks for data-limited crustacean fisheries
Ming Sun1, Adityo Setiawan2, Panca B Susila3
1School of Marine and Atmospheric Sciences, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA; Institute for Advanced Computational Science, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11794, USA.
Journal of Environmental Management
|May 4, 2023
Summary
Adaptive management frameworks can aid data-limited crustacean fisheries, but require integration to address unique life histories and data gaps for effective stock assessment and management.
Area of Science:
- Fisheries Science
- Marine Ecology
- Conservation Biology
Background:
- Crustacean fisheries are vital for global food security and economies, particularly in developing nations.
- Many Asian crustacean fisheries face challenges with limited data, scientific capacity, and effective management.
- Adaptive management frameworks offer potential solutions for data-limited fisheries by improving data collection and stock assessments.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the suitability of three adaptive fisheries management frameworks (FISHE, FishPath, DLMtool) for Asian crustacean fisheries.
- To identify data and modeling needs and management gaps within these fisheries.
- To propose an integrated framework tailored for crustacean fisheries management.
Main Methods:
- Applied three adaptive management frameworks (FISHE, FishPath, DLMtool) to diverse Asian crustacean fisheries.
- Contrasted framework applicability based on data availability, governance, and socio-economic contexts.
- Compared framework outputs to identify strengths, weaknesses, and data/modeling requirements.
Main Results:
- Each framework offered suitable management recommendations but had limitations; FISHE was more holistic, while FishPath and DLMtool focused on stock assessment and management strategy evaluation, respectively.
- Challenges in collecting commercial catch data due to funding and monitoring program design hindered management implementation.
- All frameworks faced difficulties with crustacean-specific life histories compared to finfish.
Conclusions:
- An integrated adaptive framework combining qualitative and quantitative approaches is proposed for crustacean fisheries.
- This integrated approach should consider unique crustacean life histories, climate change impacts, and participatory processes.
- Balancing socio-economic and ecological objectives is crucial for effective adaptive management in these fisheries.

