Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 31, 2025

In Situ Monitoring of Diffusion of Guest Molecules in Porous Media Using Electron Paramagnetic Resonance Imaging
Published on: September 2, 2016
Characterization of diffusion MRI using the mean apparent propagator model in hemodialysis patients: A pilot study
Wesley T Richerson1, L Tugan Muftuler2, Dawn F Wolfgram3
1Department of Biomedical Engineering, Marquette University and Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI, United States of America.
Abstract:
To better understand documented cognitive decline in hemodialysis (HD) patients, diffusion MRI (dMRI) has been used to characterize brain anatomical deficits relative to controls. Studies to this point have primarily used diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) to model the three-dimensional diffusion of water in HD patients, with DTI parameters reflecting underlying microstructural changes of brain tissue. Since DTI has some limitations in characterizing tissue microstructure, some of which may be complicated by HD, we explored the use of the mean apparent propagator (MAP) model to describe diffusion in HD patients. We collected anatomical T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs as well as multi-shell dMRI in ten HD participants and ten age-matched controls. The T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs were used for tissue segmentation and identification of white matter hyperintensity, respectively. Multi-shell dMRI data were used to estimate MAP and DTI diffusion models. Each model was then used to characterize the differences between the HD cohort and the age-matched controls in normal appearing white matter, subcortical gray matter, corpus callosum (CC) and bilateral radiata (Rad). As expected, parameters of both DTI and MAP models of dMRI were significantly different in HD participants compared to controls. However, some MAP parameters suggested additional tissue microstructural changes in HD participants, such as increased axonal diameter. Measurements of non-Gaussianity indicated that MAP provided better a diffusion estimate than DTI, and MAP appeared to provide a more accurate measure of anisotropy in Rad, based on measures of the Rad/CC ratio. In conclusion, parameters of the MAP and DTI models were both sensitive to changes in diffusivity in HD participants compared to controls; however, the MAP model appeared to provide additional detailed information about changes in brain tissue microstructure.
Insights
This study reveals that the mean apparent propagator (MAP) model offers more detailed insights into brain microstructural changes in hemodialysis (HD) patients compared to diffusion tensor imaging (DTI). MAP imaging provides a better diffusion estimate and reveals additional tissue alterations in HD patients.
Area of Science:
- Neuroimaging
- Nephrology
- Biophysics
Background:
- Cognitive decline is a documented issue in hemodialysis (HD) patients.
- Diffusion MRI (dMRI), particularly diffusion tensor imaging (DTI), has been used to study brain microstructural changes in HD patients.
- DTI has limitations in characterizing complex tissue microstructure, potentially exacerbated by HD.
Purpose of the Study:
- To explore the utility of the mean apparent propagator (MAP) model for characterizing brain diffusion in HD patients.
- To compare the sensitivity of MAP and DTI models in detecting microstructural differences between HD patients and controls.
Main Methods:
- Acquired anatomical T1, T2 FLAIR, and multi-shell dMRI data from ten HD participants and ten age-matched controls.
- Utilized T1 and T2 FLAIR MRIs for tissue segmentation and white matter hyperintensity identification.
- Estimated both MAP and DTI diffusion models from multi-shell dMRI data to analyze normal-appearing white matter, subcortical gray matter, corpus callosum (CC), and bilateral radiata (Rad).
Main Results:
- Both DTI and MAP model parameters showed significant differences between HD participants and controls.
- MAP model parameters indicated additional microstructural changes in HD patients, including potentially increased axonal diameter.
- MAP provided a superior diffusion estimate, evidenced by measurements of non-Gaussianity, and a more accurate anisotropy measure in the radiata (Rad) compared to DTI.
Conclusions:
- Both MAP and DTI models are sensitive to diffusion changes in HD patients.
- The MAP model provides more detailed information on brain tissue microstructure alterations in HD patients than DTI.
- MAP imaging shows promise for a more comprehensive understanding of HD-related neurological deficits.
Related Concept Videos
Physiological Pharmacokinetic Models: Blood Flow-Limited Versus Diffusion-Limited Models
Dialysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
Assessment of Diffusion and Perfusion
The Role of Diffusion in Respiration
Diffusion is the process by which molecules move from an area of higher concentration to an area of lower concentration. In the respiratory system, this...

