Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Uncertainty Principle04:08

The Uncertainty Principle

23.5K
Werner Heisenberg considered the limits of how accurately one can measure properties of an electron or other microscopic particles. He determined that there is a fundamental limit to how accurately one can measure both a particle’s position and its momentum simultaneously. The more accurate the measurement of the momentum of a particle is known, the less accurate the position at that time is known and vice versa. This is what is now called the Heisenberg uncertainty principle. He...
23.5K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

74.1K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
74.1K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments02:46

Uncertainty in Measurement: Reading Instruments

38.4K
Counting is the type of measurement that is free from uncertainty, provided the number of objects being counted does not change during the process. Such measurements result in exact numbers. By counting the eggs in a carton, for instance, one can determine exactly how many eggs are there in the carton. Similarly, the numbers of defined quantities are also exact. For example, 1 foot is exactly 12 inches, 1 inch is exactly 2.54 centimeters, and 1 gram is exactly 0.001 kilograms. Quantities...
38.4K
Random and Systematic Errors01:20

Random and Systematic Errors

11.2K
Scientists always try their best to record measurements with the utmost accuracy and precision. However, sometimes errors do occur. These errors can be random or systematic. Random errors are observed due to the inconsistency or fluctuation in the measurement process, or variations in the quantity itself that is being measured. Such errors fluctuate from being greater than or less than the true value in repeated measurements. Consider a scientist measuring the length of an earthworm using a...
11.2K
Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error01:10

Propagation of Uncertainty from Systematic Error

568
The atomic mass of an element varies due to the relative ratio of its isotopes. A sample's relative proportion of oxygen isotopes influences its average atomic mass. For instance, if we were to measure the atomic mass of oxygen from a sample, the mass would be a weighted average of the isotopic masses of oxygen in that sample. Since a single sample is not likely to perfectly reflect the true atomic mass of oxygen for all the molecules of oxygen on Earth, the mass we obtain from this...
568
Statistical Analysis: Overview01:11

Statistical Analysis: Overview

6.7K
When we take repeated measurements on the same or replicated samples, we will observe inconsistencies in the magnitude. These inconsistencies are called errors. To categorize and characterize these results and their errors, the researcher can use statistical analysis to determine the quality of the measurements and/or suitability of the methods.
One of the most commonly used statistical quantifiers is the mean, which is the ratio between the sum of the numerical values of all results and the...
6.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Universal Bounds for Quantum Metrology in the Presence of Correlated Noise.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Noise-resistant phase imaging with intensity correlation.

Science advances·2023
Same author

Using Adaptiveness and Causal Superpositions Against Noise in Quantum Metrology.

Physical review letters·2023
Same author

Quantum Asymmetry and Noisy Multimode Interferometry.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Multiple-Phase Quantum Interferometry: Real and Apparent Gains of Measuring All the Phases Simultaneously.

Physical review letters·2022
Same author

Using Quantum Metrological Bounds in Quantum Error Correction: A Simple Proof of the Approximate Eastin-Knill Theorem.

Physical review letters·2021

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.5K

Measurement Noise Susceptibility in Quantum Estimation.

Stanisław Kurdziałek1, Rafał Demkowicz-Dobrzański1

  • 1Faculty of Physics, University of Warsaw, Pasteura 5, 02-093 Warszawa, Poland.

Physical Review Letters
|May 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary

We introduce a new metric, Fisher information measurement noise susceptibility, to quantify precision loss in quantum metrology due to measurement imperfections. This helps assess the robustness of quantum sensing technologies.

More Related Videos

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source
12:19

Measurement of Quantum Interference in a Silicon Ring Resonator Photon Source

Published on: April 4, 2017

8.5K
The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry
12:14

The Generation of Higher-order Laguerre-Gauss Optical Beams for High-precision Interferometry

Published on: August 12, 2013

21.8K
Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum physics
  • Quantum metrology
  • Quantum information science

Background:

  • Fisher information quantifies ultimate precision in quantum parameter estimation.
  • Existing methods do not account for measurement imperfections in quantum sensing.
  • Practical quantum metrology is limited by noise in measurement processes.

Purpose of the Study:

  • Introduce a new metric: Fisher information measurement noise susceptibility.
  • Quantify the loss of Fisher information caused by measurement noise.
  • Analyze the robustness of quantum estimation schemes against imperfections.

Main Methods:

  • Derivation of an explicit formula for Fisher information measurement noise susceptibility.
  • Application of the new metric to analyze standard quantum estimation protocols.
  • Evaluation of noise impact on interferometry and superresolution imaging.

Main Results:

  • Fisher information measurement noise susceptibility quantifies precision degradation.
  • The new metric reveals vulnerabilities in quantum estimation schemes.
  • Analysis demonstrates susceptibility in interferometry and superresolution imaging.

Conclusions:

  • Fisher information measurement noise susceptibility is crucial for practical quantum metrology.
  • The metric provides a tool to design more robust quantum sensing strategies.
  • This work advances the understanding of noise effects in quantum information processing.