Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Tectal gliomas with "low-grade appearance": Natural history on MR imaging.

Neuro-oncology practice·2026
Same author

Endolymphatic hydrops in patients with migraine: a correlative study.

Frontiers in neurology·2026
Same author

Authors' Response to Comments on "Symptom and Handicap Severity in Subacute Dizzy Patients: The Role of Gaze Position Error in Video Head Impulses".

Otology & neurotology : official publication of the American Otological Society, American Neurotology Society [and] European Academy of Otology and Neurotology·2026
Same author

Anatomical characteristics of the styloid process associated with internal carotid artery dissection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of controlled trials.

Frontiers in radiology·2026
Same author

Temporal evolution of impedance after motorized versus manual cochlear implantation.

Hearing research·2026
Same author

Does endolymphatic hydrops affect cochlear and vestibular nerve volumes? An MRI-based morphometric study.

Frontiers in neurology·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K

Postoperative Impedance-Based Estimation of Cochlear Implant Electrode Insertion Depth.

Stephan Schraivogel1,2, Philipp Aebischer1,2, Franca Wagner3

  • 1Hearing Research Laboratory, ARTORG Center for Biomedical Engineering Research, University of Bern, Bern, Switzerland.

Ear and Hearing
|May 9, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study validates an impedance-based method for estimating cochlear implant electrode depth, offering a radiation-free alternative to radiography. The method proved reliable for long-term monitoring of electrode migration.

More Related Videos

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.2K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

493

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 31, 2025

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery
06:54

Author Spotlight: Advancements in Impedance Monitoring for Cochlear Implant Surgery

Published on: August 4, 2023

1.3K
Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access
08:06

Robotic Cochlear Implantation for Direct Cochlear Access

Published on: June 16, 2022

3.2K
Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion
03:58

Enhancing Electrode Location Assessment in Cochlear Implantation via Computed Tomography Image Fusion

Published on: January 17, 2025

493

Area of Science:

  • Otolaryngology
  • Biomedical Engineering
  • Medical Imaging

Background:

  • Cochlear implant electrode positioning is crucial for fitting and monitoring.
  • Current methods like radiography involve radiation exposure.
  • A non-invasive, cost-effective alternative is needed.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To extend and validate an impedance-based method for estimating cochlear implant electrode insertion depths.
  • To assess the reliability of this method for postoperative follow-up over several months.
  • To provide a radiation-free alternative to radiography for electrode position determination.

Main Methods:

  • Utilized computed tomography (CT) scans from 56 cases for ground truth insertion depths.
  • Analyzed impedance telemetry records from implantation up to 60 months.
  • Estimated linear and angular electrode insertion depths using a phenomenological model and compared with CT data.

Main Results:

  • The impedance-based method estimated electrode insertion depths with an absolute error of 0.9 ± 0.6 mm or 22 ± 18 degrees.
  • Postoperative tissue resistances remained stable, with minor increases in basal electrodes over time.
  • The estimation method showed reliability over time when comparing serial CT scans.

Conclusions:

  • The impedance-based method is a reliable, radiation-free tool for estimating cochlear implant electrode positions.
  • This method can be applied to postoperative impedance telemetry recordings for clinical use.
  • Further research should focus on improving performance by addressing extracochlear electrode detection.