Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Creation of Two Saccular Elastase-Digested Aneurysms with Different Hemodynamics in One Rabbit
Published on: April 15, 2021
Early postoperative outcome after carotid artery endarterectomy with bifurcation advancement
Felix L Moehle1, Bernard Krueger2, Anna-Leonie Menges1
1Department of Vascular Surgery, University Hospital Zurich, Switzerland.
Insights
Bifurcation advancement carotid endarterectomy (BA-CEA) shows comparable stroke and death rates to national data. However, BA-CEA may increase risks of cranial nerve injuries and overall mortality compared to standard carotid endarterectomy (CEA).
Area of Science:
- Vascular Surgery
- Cerebrovascular Disease Management
- Surgical Outcomes Research
Background:
- Carotid artery disease (CAD) poses a significant risk for stroke.
- Carotid endarterectomy (CEA) is a primary surgical intervention for symptomatic and asymptomatic CAD.
- Bifurcation advancement carotid endarterectomy (BA-CEA) is a specific surgical technique for CEA.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the single-center outcomes of BA-CEA.
- To compare in-hospital results of BA-CEA with a large national database (German database - GD).
- To analyze complication rates including stroke, death, and cranial nerve injuries.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 239 BA-CEA procedures performed between 2006-2015.
- Comparison of outcomes (stroke, death, TIA, hematoma, nerve injuries) with published data from the German database (n=142,074).
- Stratification of patients into symptomatic and asymptomatic CAD subgroups.
Main Results:
- The overall perioperative stroke and death rate for BA-CEA was 2.5%.
- BA-CEA showed comparable combined stroke and death rates and isolated stroke rates to the German database.
- BA-CEA had a significantly higher overall mortality rate (1.7% vs. 0.6%) and cranial nerve injury risk (5.0% vs. 1.2%) compared to the German database.
Conclusions:
- BA-CEA offers comparable perioperative stroke and mortality outcomes to standard CEA.
- The BA-CEA technique may be associated with increased risks of overall mortality and local neurological complications, specifically cranial nerve injuries.
- Further investigation into the technical aspects of BA-CEA is warranted to mitigate associated risks.
Abstract:
Background: The aim of this study is to review the single center experience in surgical treatment of carotid artery disease (CAD) using bifurcation advancement carotid endarterectomy (BA-CEA) and compare the in-hospital outcome with one of the largest nationwide carotid endarterectomy (CEA) databases worldwide, the German statutory quality assurance database (GD). Patients and methods: Data of BA-CEA procedures in the period of 2006-2015 were analyzed retrospectively. The primary endpoint was defined as combined stroke and death rate. Secondarily, isolated stroke, TIA, patient death, myocardial infarction, major neck hematoma and cranial nerve injuries were analyzed. Symptomatic and asymptomatic CAD patients were divided into two subgroups. The results were compared to extracted published data from the German database (GD). Results: Of 239 included BA-CEA procedures 188 (78.7%) procedures were carried out in patients with symptomatic carotid artery stenosis. The overall perioperative combined stroke and death rate after BA-CEA was 2.5%. Five (2.1%) patients suffered from a stroke (one minor and four major strokes), of which two hemorrhagic strokes ended fatally. Overall, four (1.7%) patients died perioperatively. The combined stroke and death rate was higher in the symptomatic subgroup (3.2%; 0% in the asymptomatic group). No significant differences were found between the results of BA-CEA and the German database (n=142'074) for combined stroke and death rates and isolated stroke. Significant differences were found among the overall mortality rate (BA-CEA: 1.7% vs. GD: 0.6, p=0.04). The risk of postoperative cranial nerve injuries was also significantly higher after BA-CEA overall (BA-CEA: 5.0% vs. GD: 1.2%, p=<0.0001), in symptomatic CAD patients (BA-CEA: 4.8% vs. GD: 1.2%, p=<0.0001) and in asymptomatic CAD patients (BA-CEA: 5.9% vs. GD: 1.3%, p=0.01). Conclusions: CEA with bifurcation advancement provides comparable perioperative results, focusing on combined stroke and mortality, but seems to have some technical drawbacks, which may lead to more frequent local neurological complications.
Related Concept Videos
Aneurysm IV: Nursing Management
Peripheral Artery Disease V: Postoperative Nursing Management
Cardiomyopathy VII: Pre and Post Operative Nursing Management

