Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

In Vitro Modeling of Down Syndrome Neurogenesis Using Human-Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells
Published on: March 7, 2025
Impact of a prenatal screening program on the Down syndrome phenotype: An interrupted time series analysis
Ellen Hollands Steffensen1,2,3, Lars Henning Pedersen3,4,5, Stina Lou1,6
1Center for Fetal Diagnostics, Aarhus University, Aarhus, Denmark.
Insights
National screening for Down syndrome (DS) in Denmark did not significantly alter the overall phenotype. While non-severe congenital heart disease decreased, increased neonatal intensive care admissions and hearing impairment risks were observed in DS children born after screening.
Area of Science:
- Medical Genetics
- Prenatal Diagnostics
- Pediatric Health
Background:
- Down syndrome (DS) is a genetic disorder associated with characteristic physical features and developmental delays.
- Prenatal screening aims to identify chromosomal abnormalities like trisomy 21 (Down syndrome) early in pregnancy.
- The implementation of national screening programs may influence the phenotype and health outcomes of affected children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate if prenatal screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21 in Denmark influenced the phenotype of children with Down syndrome.
- To analyze changes in birth biometry, congenital malformations, and early childhood morbidity in Down syndrome cases before and after screening implementation.
Main Methods:
- A nationwide register-based study in Denmark included live-born singletons with Down syndrome from 1995 to 2018.
- Interrupted time series analyses were used to assess temporal trends in birth biometry, malformations, and morbidity.
- Comparisons were made between children born before and after the national prenatal screening program's implementation.
Main Results:
- No significant change in the overall Down syndrome phenotype was observed post-screening implementation.
- A decrease in non-severe congenital heart disease was noted, though limited by small sample sizes.
- Increased odds of neonatal intensive care unit admission and a higher risk of hearing impairment were associated with the screening program.
Conclusions:
- The national prenatal screening program in Denmark did not lead to a milder Down syndrome phenotype overall.
- A potential reduction in non-severe congenital heart disease requires further investigation due to limited data.
- The screening program was linked to increased neonatal intensive care admissions and hearing impairment risks in children with Down syndrome.
Introduction:
We hypothesized that children with Down syndrome who were born after the implementation of first-trimester combined screening for trisomy 13, 18, and 21 and a second-trimester ultrasound scan in Denmark would show a milder syndrome phenotype. We investigated the birth biometry, prevalence of congenital malformations, and early childhood morbidity of children with Down syndrome before and after implementation of this screening program.
Material And Methods:
A nationwide register-based study of all live born singletons with Down syndrome in Denmark from 1995 to 2018. In interrupted time series analyses, we studied the temporal developments in birth biometry, prevalence of congenital malformations, and early childhood morbidity related to the implementation of a national prenatal screening program.
Results:
We included 602 singletons with Down syndrome born before and 308 after implementation of the screening program. Z-scores of birthweight and head circumference increased over time before screening, but this temporal development changed after implementation by -0.05 (95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.11 to 0.01) and -0.05 (95% CI -0.12 to 0.02), respectively. Just after implementation, the prevalence of non-severe congenital heart disease decreased (relative change in odds 0.48 [95% CI: 0.24-0.94]). For severe congenital heart disease, atrioventricular septal defect, and non-heart malformations, this change was 1.16 (95% CI: 0.56-2.41), 0.95 (95% CI: 0.43-2.03), and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.33-2.76), respectively. For all malformations, pre-existing temporal developments did not change following implementation of screening. The implementation was associated with higher odds of admission to a neonatal intensive care unit (relative change 1.98 [95% CI: 0.76-5.26]) and an increased risk of hearing impairment (risk difference 3.4% [95% CI: -0.4% to 7.1%]). In contrast, the implementation was not associated with the incidence of hospital admissions by 2 years of age or with the probability of a thyroid disorder.
Conclusions:
After implementation of a national prenatal screening program, we did not observe a milder Down syndrome phenotype apart from an apparent reduction in the proportion of children with non-severe congenital heart disease; this result is, however, limited by small numbers.
More Related Videos
09:03Semiconductor Sequencing for Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy
Published on: August 25, 2019
09:39Generation of Induced Pluripotent Stem Cells from Turner Syndrome 45XO Fetal Cells for Downstream Modelling of Neurological Deficits Associated with the Syndrome
Published on: December 4, 2021
Related Concept Videos
Meiosis vs. Mitosis
Before the start of mitosis and meiosis I, the cell synthesizes DNA, resulting in two homologous copies of each chromosome. DNA synthesis is...
Karyotyping
Meiosis I
Regression Toward the Mean
Teratogenicity