Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Perceptual and Category Processing of the Uncanny Valley Hypothesis' Dimension of Human Likeness: Some Methodological Issues
Published on: June 3, 2013
Differential Fairness: An Intersectional Framework for Fair AI
Rashidul Islam1, Kamrun Naher Keya1, Shimei Pan1
1Department of Information Systems, University of Maryland, Baltimore County, Baltimore, MD 21250, USA.
We introduce intersectional fairness criteria for artificial intelligence (AI) and machine learning (ML) systems, addressing real-world harms across multiple protected attributes. Our methods provide theoretical guarantees and practical algorithms for fairer AI development.
Area of Science:
- Computer Science
- Social Science
- Law
Background:
- Existing fairness metrics in AI/ML often fail to capture the complex, overlapping nature of discrimination.
- Intersectionality, a framework from social sciences and law, offers a lens to understand how multiple identity dimensions (e.g., race, gender, disability) interact to create unique experiences of oppression.
- Applying intersectional principles to AI fairness is crucial for mitigating nuanced forms of bias.
Purpose of the Study:
- To propose novel definitions of fairness in AI and machine learning systems grounded in the intersectionality framework.
- To develop theoretical guarantees (economic, privacy, generalization) for these intersectional fairness criteria.
- To create practical algorithms that operationalize and measure intersectional fairness in real-world applications.
Main Methods:
- Developed intersectional fairness criteria by extending existing fairness definitions to account for overlapping protected attributes.
- Proved theoretical guarantees, including economic, privacy, and generalization bounds, for the proposed fairness criteria.
- Designed and implemented two learning algorithms: a deterministic gradient method for theoretical analysis and a stochastic gradient method for scalability to big data, incorporating minibatch estimation.
Main Results:
- Demonstrated that the proposed fairness criteria are sensible across subsets of protected attributes and provide meaningful operationalization of AI fairness.
- Showcased the interpretability of the fairness measurements, analogous to differential privacy.
- Validated the utility of the developed algorithms through case studies on diverse datasets (census, COMPAS, HHP, HMDA).
Conclusions:
- The proposed intersectional fairness criteria offer a robust framework for developing more equitable AI systems.
- The developed algorithms effectively address the challenges of data sparsity in measuring intersectional fairness, enabling practical application.
- This work bridges theoretical fairness concepts with practical implementation, paving the way for fairer AI across various domains.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Bias
In statistics, a sampling bias is created when a sample is collected from a population, and some members of the population are not as likely to be chosen as others (remember, each member...
Non-equilibrium in the Cell
Measures of Intelligence
Validity refers to how well a test measures what it claims to measure. An intelligence test should accurately assess intelligence rather than another characteristic, like anxiety. Criterion validity is one way to evaluate this;...
Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination
Stereotype Content Model
Weighted Mean
For example, consider the number of goals scored in the matches of a tournament. While computing the average number of goals scored in the tournament, it may be more important to...

