Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Transradial Access Chemoembolization for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Patients
Published on: September 20, 2020
Distal transradial access decreases radial artery occlusion rate in percutaneous coronary interventions
Lin Tu1, Yan Jin2, Shanshan Li1
1Department of Cardiology, The First People's Hospital of Guiyang Guiyang 550005, Guizhou, China.
Insights
Distal transradial access (dTRA) significantly reduces radial artery occlusion (RAO) after percutaneous coronary interventions compared to conventional transradial access (cTRA). This approach also shortens compression time, improving patient outcomes.
Area of Science:
- Cardiovascular Interventions
- Vascular Access Techniques
- Interventional Cardiology
Background:
- Radial artery occlusion (RAO) is a potential complication of transradial access in percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs).
- Comparing distal transradial access (dTRA) and conventional transradial access (cTRA) is crucial for optimizing PCI procedures.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate the incidence of RAO following dTRA versus cTRA.
- To compare the advantages and disadvantages of dTRA and cTRA in PCIs.
Main Methods:
- Retrospective analysis of 110 patients undergoing PCIs.
- Comparison of RAO incidence between dTRA (n=56) and cTRA (n=54) groups.
Main Results:
- RAO incidence was significantly lower in the dTRA group than in the cTRA group (P<0.05).
- Independent risk factors for RAO included postoperative arterial compression time and dTRA (multivariable analysis).
- Smoking and radial artery spasm were also identified as exposure factors for RAO.
Conclusions:
- Distal transradial access (dTRA) is associated with a decreased incidence of radial artery occlusion (RAO).
- dTRA shortens postoperative arterial compression time compared to the conventional transradial approach (cTRA).
Background:
To investigate the incidence of complications such as radial artery occlusion (RAO) after distal or conventional transradial access in percutaneous coronary interventions, and to compare the advantages and disadvantages of those two approaches.
Methods:
In this retrospective study, the data of 110 patients received either distal transradial access (dTRA) (n=56 cases) or conventional transradial access (cTRA) (n=54 cases) in percutaneous coronary interventions were analyzed to compare the incidence of RAO.
Results:
The incidence of RAO in the dTRA group significantly decreased compared with that in the cTRA group (P<0.05). Univariate analysis indicated that smoking (r=0.064, P=0.011), dTRA (r=0.431, P<0.001), cTRA (r=0.088, P=0.015), radial artery spasm (r=-0.021, P=0.016), and postoperative arterial compression time (r=0.081, P<0.001) were exposure factors for the incidence of RAO. In multivariable analysis, independent risk factors for RAO were postoperative arterial compression time (P=0.038) and dTRA (P<0.001).
Conclusions:
dTRA shortened the postoperative arterial compression time and decreased the incidence of RAO compared with conventional transradial approach.
Related Concept Videos
Assessment of radial pulse
The radial pulse, located at the wrist, is often the preferred site for assessing peripheral pulse because of its accessibility and dependability. The process of determining the radial pulse involves several steps:
Assessment of apical radial pulse
The A-R pulse assessment involves simultaneous evaluation of the apical and radial pulses. When the apical and radial pulse rates vary, this assessment helps identify a pulse deficit.
Pre-Procedural Preparation
Peripheral Artery Disease III: Interprofessional Care
Arteries of the Upper Limbs
Coronary Artery Disease V: Interprofessional Care
Peripheral Arterial Disease II: Clinical Manifestations and Diagnostic Evaluation

