Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom02:45

The Quantum-Mechanical Model of an Atom

42.6K
Shortly after de Broglie published his ideas that the electron in a hydrogen atom could be better thought of as being a circular standing wave instead of a particle moving in quantized circular orbits, Erwin Schrödinger extended de Broglie’s work by deriving what is now known as the Schrödinger equation. When Schrödinger applied his equation to hydrogen-like atoms, he was able to reproduce Bohr’s expression for the energy and, thus, the Rydberg formula governing hydrogen spectra.
42.6K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

964
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
964
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Otto and Diesel Cycle01:27

Otto and Diesel Cycle

1.8K
An Otto engine is a four-stroke engine that uses a mixture of gasoline and air as the working fuel. The fuel is injected into the cylinder, and the piston is moved completely down so that the cylinder is at maximum volume. By moving the piston up, adiabatic compression takes place. The spark plug ignites the gasoline-air mixture, and the burning fuel adds heat to the system at a constant volume. The heated mixture expands adiabatically and gets further cooled by exhausting heat, and this cyclic...
1.8K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Thermodynamic entropic uncertainty relation.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Fundamental Precision Limits in Finite-Dimensional Quantum Thermal Machines.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Quantum-computer-based verification of quantum thermodynamic uncertainty relation.

Physical review. E·2025
Same author

Thermodynamic Concentration Inequalities and Trade-Off Relations.

Physical review letters·2025
Same author

Exact solution to quantum dynamical activity.

Physical review. E·2024
Same author

Lie Algebraic Quantum Phase Reduction.

Physical review letters·2024

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K

Quantum Otto cycle under strong coupling.

Mao Kaneyasu1, Yoshihiko Hasegawa1

  • 1Department of Information and Communication Engineering, Graduate School of Information Science and Technology, The University of Tokyo, Tokyo 113-8656, Japan.

Physical Review. E
|May 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary

This study introduces a quantum Otto cycle model that accounts for system-reservoir interactions, moving beyond the weak-coupling assumption. The new model demonstrates potentially higher efficiency than traditional models, especially with optimized interactions.

More Related Videos

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K
Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

9.7K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators
09:23

Quantum State Engineering of Light with Continuous-wave Optical Parametric Oscillators

Published on: May 30, 2014

14.6K
Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs
06:42

Generation and Coherent Control of Pulsed Quantum Frequency Combs

Published on: June 8, 2018

9.0K
Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform
05:39

Scalable Quantum Integrated Circuits on Superconducting Two-Dimensional Electron Gas Platform

Published on: August 2, 2019

9.7K

Area of Science:

  • Quantum thermodynamics
  • Quantum heat engines
  • Statistical mechanics

Background:

  • Quantum heat engines are typically analyzed under the weak-coupling assumption, which simplifies analysis but lacks quantum scale justification.
  • The interaction between quantum systems and their reservoirs is often non-negligible and requires a more general theoretical framework.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To propose a generalized quantum Otto cycle model that does not rely on the weak-coupling assumption.
  • To analyze the efficiency of this new model and compare it with existing weak-coupling models.
  • To investigate methods for optimizing quantum heat engine efficiency through system-reservoir interactions.

Main Methods:

  • Replacing the weak-coupling thermalization process with a combined thermalization and decoupling process.
  • Analytical calculation of the quantum Otto cycle efficiency under the generalized model.
  • Numerical examination of the interaction strength's effect on efficiency using a two-level system.
  • Analysis of majorization relations to determine optimal interaction Hamiltonians.

Main Results:

  • The proposed model's efficiency analytically reduces to the weak-coupling model's efficiency in the weak-interaction limit.
  • A sufficient condition for the proposed model's efficiency not surpassing the weak-coupling model is identified as a positive cost in decoupling processes.
  • Numerical simulations show that the proposed model can achieve higher efficiency than the weak-coupling model in specific scenarios.
  • Optimal interaction Hamiltonians were designed, leading to demonstrated higher efficiency in numerical experiments.

Conclusions:

  • The generalized quantum Otto cycle model provides a more realistic framework for analyzing quantum heat engines.
  • System-reservoir interactions can be leveraged to enhance quantum heat engine efficiency beyond weak-coupling limits.
  • The study offers a design principle for optimal interaction Hamiltonians to maximize engine performance.