Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Colors and Magnetism03:02

Colors and Magnetism

12.0K
Color in Coordination Complexes
When atoms or molecules absorb light at the proper frequency, their electrons are excited to higher-energy orbitals. For many main group atoms and molecules, the absorbed photons are in the ultraviolet range of the electromagnetic spectrum, which cannot be detected by the human eye. For coordination compounds, the energy difference between the d orbitals often allows photons in the visible range to be absorbed and emitted, which is seen as colors by the human...
12.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.5K
Ferromagnetism01:31

Ferromagnetism

2.4K
Materials like iron, nickel, and cobalt consist of magnetic domains, within which the magnetic dipoles are arranged parallel to each other. The magnetic dipoles are rigidly aligned in the same direction within a domain by quantum mechanical coupling among the atoms. This coupling is so strong that even thermal agitation at room temperature cannot break it. The result is that each domain has a net dipole moment. However, some materials have weaker coupling, and are ferromagnetic at lower...
2.4K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

The Reactivity of Diiron(I) Bis-cyclopentadienyl Tricarbonyl Aminocarbyne Complexes in Aqueous Media: A Case Study for Iron-Based Anticancer Agents.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Selective Functionalization with Organophosphite Ligands of Atomically Precise Platinum Chini Clusters.

Inorganic chemistry·2026
Same author

Ferrocene-Diiron(I) Bis(cyclopentadienyl) Conjugates Exhibit Potent In Vitro Cytotoxicity and Selectivity toward Cancer Cells Associated with ROS Scavenging.

Journal of medicinal chemistry·2026
Same author

Diphosphine-Substituted Rhodium Carbonyl Clusters: Synthesis and Structural and Spectroscopic Characterization of the Heteroleptic Rh<sub>4</sub>(CO)<sub>8+2n</sub>(L)<sub>2-n</sub> (n = 0, 1) and {Rh<sub>4</sub>(CO)<sub>10</sub>L}<sub>2</sub> Monomeric and Dimeric Species.

Molecules (Basel, Switzerland)·2026
Same author

Coligand-Dependent Cellular Effects and DNA/BSA Binding of Ruthenium(II) Tris(pyrazolylmethane) Complexes.

Inorganic chemistry·2025
Same author

Multicomponent Synthesis on a Diiron Platform of Stable Ferrabenzenes with Promising Anticancer Activity.

Angewandte Chemie (International ed. in English)·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
06:53

Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K

A proficient multivariate approach for iron(II) spin crossover behaviour modelling in the solid state.

Lorenzo Marchi1, Simone Fantuzzi1, Andrea Cingolani2

  • 1Dipartimento di Scienze Chimiche e Geologiche, Università degli Studi di Modena e Reggio Emilia, via G. Campi 103, 41125 Modena, Italy. luca.rigamonti@unimore.it.

Dalton Transactions (Cambridge, England : 2003)
|May 18, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Iron(II) spin crossover complexes exhibit tunable behavior based on crystal packing. Multivariate analysis of structural data helps predict spin transition temperatures and understand SCO activity.

More Related Videos

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.6K
Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 30, 2025

Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks
06:53

Author Spotlight: Magnetometric Characterization of Intermediates in the Solid-State Electrochemistry of Redox-Active Metal-Organic Frameworks

Published on: June 9, 2023

2.0K
Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses
08:55

Methods of Ex Situ and In Situ Investigations of Structural Transformations: The Case of Crystallization of Metallic Glasses

Published on: June 7, 2018

8.6K
Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry
16:11

Thermochemical Studies of NiII and ZnII Ternary Complexes Using Ion Mobility-Mass Spectrometry

Published on: June 8, 2022

2.4K

Area of Science:

  • Coordination Chemistry
  • Materials Science
  • Computational Chemistry

Background:

  • Iron(II) bis-pyrazolilpyridyl (bpp-R) complexes exhibit spin crossover (SCO), transitioning between high-spin (HS) and low-spin (LS) states.
  • SCO behavior is modulated by crystal packing, influenced by substituents (R), anions (X-), and co-crystallized solvents.
  • Understanding these structural influences is crucial for designing materials with predictable SCO properties.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To apply a multivariate approach combining Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.
  • To model and rationalize structural data from HS iron(II) SCO complexes.
  • To distinguish between SCO-active and HS-blocked complexes and predict spin transition temperatures (T1/2).

Main Methods:

  • Utilized chemometric tools: Principal Component Analysis (PCA) and Partial Least Squares (PLS) regression.
  • Analyzed coordination bond distances, angles, and selected torsional angles from available HS structures.
  • Developed a multivariate model to correlate structural parameters with SCO behavior.

Main Results:

  • The multivariate approach successfully modeled and rationalized the structural data.
  • Effectively distinguished between SCO-active and HS-blocked complexes based on structural features.
  • Demonstrated the ability to predict spin transition temperatures (T1/2) for various complexes.

Conclusions:

  • Crystal packing significantly influences SCO behavior in Iron(II) complexes.
  • The developed PCA-PLS model provides an efficient method for understanding and predicting SCO properties.
  • This approach aids in the rational design of novel spin crossover materials.