Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Simulated hearing loss in healthy young and older adults results in poor reaction time in older adults.

Pacific journal of health (Stockton, Calif.)·2026
Same author

Characterizing goal-directed whole-body movements in autistic children and children with developmental coordination disorder.

Research in autism spectrum disorders·2026
Same author

Facial Synkinesis Patient Reported Outcome Measure 45-Item Survey (FSP-45).

Plastic and reconstructive surgery·2026
Same author

Fall-Related Emergency Department Visits Among Adults With and Without Intellectual and Developmental Disabilities or Cerebral Palsy.

Annals of family medicine·2026
Same author

Beyond Boundaries: Data Sharing in Motor Development Research-Best Practices, Challenges, and Opportunities.

Journal of motor learning and development·2026
Same author

Effects of Exercise and Intensive Vascular Risk Reduction on Cognitive Function in Older Adults: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

JAMA neurology·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical study of Tibial plateau fractures using 3D printing and digital design: A finite element analysis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Biomechanical effects of Kinesio versus Mulligan ankle taping on balance and ankle function in chronic STROKE: A randomized controlled trial.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Interlimb differences in knee joint loading and stress distribution following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction during stair descent.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Exploring real-world lumbar posture behaviour. A whole day comparison of individuals with low back pain and healthy controls.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Motor differences in jumping among children with and without autism spectrum disorder.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
Same journal

Reduced lower extremity strength, altered muscle activation, and unchanged kinetics during single-leg squatting in males with patellofemoral pain versus pain-free males: A cross-sectional analysis.

Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

25.9K

Motor differences in autism during a human-robot imitative gesturing task.

Nicholas E Fears1, Gabriela M Sherrod2, Danielle Blankenship3

  • 1University of North Texas, Health Science Center, Fort Worth, TX, USA; University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI, USA; Louisiana State University, Baton Rouge, LA, USA.

Clinical Biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
|May 19, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Autistic individuals show less accurate imitation of robot gestures, particularly arm movements. This research uses motion capture to objectively measure motor differences in autism during human-robot interaction.

Keywords:
AutismDynamic time warpingGestureImitationRobot

More Related Videos

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.1K
Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
05:32

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos

Published on: December 7, 2018

9.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development
11:50

EEG Mu Rhythm in Typical and Atypical Development

Published on: April 9, 2014

25.9K
One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence
14:05

One Dimensional Turing-Like Handshake Test for Motor Intelligence

Published on: December 15, 2010

27.1K
Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos
05:32

Comparing Eye-tracking Data of Children with High-functioning ASD, Comorbid ADHD, and of a Control Watching Social Videos

Published on: December 7, 2018

9.0K

Area of Science:

  • Neuroscience
  • Developmental Psychology
  • Robotics

Background:

  • Imitative gesturing difficulties are a key feature of autism spectrum disorder (ASD).
  • Current assessment methods for imitation are subjective and lack precision.
  • Technological advancements enable objective quantification of movement differences in human-robot interactions.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantify imitative gesturing differences between autistic and neurotypical individuals during human-robot interaction.
  • To objectively measure motor control and sensorimotor integration in autism.

Main Methods:

  • Thirty-five participants (19 autistic, 16 neurotypical) imitated gestures from an interactive robot.
  • Motion-capture technology recorded participant and robot movements.
  • Dynamic time warping analyzed movement alignment and joint work contribution.

Main Results:

  • Autistic participants demonstrated lower imitative accuracy compared to neurotypical individuals.
  • Differences were most pronounced in movements involving unilateral arm extension.
  • Autistic individuals showed reduced shoulder work contribution during imitation.

Conclusions:

  • Objective differences exist in the imitative gesturing abilities of autistic individuals during human-robot interaction.
  • Findings enhance understanding of motor control and sensorimotor integration in autism.
  • This research may inform the development of targeted interventions for autism.