Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025
Asymmetric Walkway: A Novel Behavioral Assay for Studying Asymmetric Locomotion
Published on: January 15, 2016
Development of an assessment of bilateral locomotor efficacy for individuals post-stroke
Caitlin L Banks1, Carolynn Patten1
1Biomechanics, Rehabilitation, and Integrative Neuroscience (BRaIN) Lab, Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, UC Davis School of Medicine, Sacramento, CA, USA; UC Davis Center for Neuroengineering and Medicine, Davis, CA, USA; Biomedical Engineering Graduate Group, UC Davis, Davis, CA, USA; VA Northern California Health Care System, Martinez, CA, USA.
Background:
A common framework is needed to assess walking impairments in older adults and individuals with stroke. This study develops an Assessment of Bilateral Locomotor Efficacy (ABLE) that is a straightforward indicator of walking function.
Research Question:
Can we develop a clinically accessible index of walking function that summarizes gait dysfunction secondary to stroke?
Methods:
The ABLE index was developed using a retrospective sample of 14 community-dwelling older adults. Data from 33 additional older adults and 105 individuals with chronic post-stroke hemiparesis were used to validate the index by factor analysis of the score components and correlation with multiple common assessments of lower extremity impairment and function.
Results:
The ABLE consists of four components summed for a maximum possible score of 12. The components include self-selected walking speed (SSWS), speed change from SSWS to fastest speed, non-paretic leg step length change from SSWS to fastest speed, and peak paretic leg ankle power. The ABLE revealed good concurrent validity with all recorded functional assessments. Factor analysis suggested that the ABLE measures two factors: one for forward progression and another for speed adaptability.
Significance:
The ABLE offers a straightforward, objective measure of walking function in adults, including individuals with chronic stroke. The index may also prove useful as a screening tool for subclinical pathology in community-dwelling older adults, but further testing is required. We encourage utilization of this index and reproduction of findings to adapt and refine the instrument for wider use and eventual clinical application.
