Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Improved Renal Denervation Mitigated Hypertension Induced by Angiotensin II Infusion
Published on: May 26, 2022
Angiotensin-Neprilysin Inhibition in Patients With Mildly Reduced or Preserved Ejection Fraction and Worsening
Robert J Mentz1, Jonathan H Ward2, Adrian F Hernandez1
1Duke Clinical Research Institute, Durham, North Carolina, USA.
Insights
Sacubitril/valsartan demonstrated greater NT-proBNP reduction in heart failure patients (EF >40%) post-worsening event, showing clinical benefits despite increased hypotension. This study provides key insights into heart failure management.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Pharmacology
- Clinical Trials
Background:
- U.S. guidelines suggest sacubitril/valsartan for chronic heart failure (HF) with mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF).
- The safety and efficacy of initiating sacubitril/valsartan in patients with EF >40% following a worsening heart failure (WHF) event remain uncertain.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the effectiveness of sacubitril/valsartan compared to valsartan in patients with EF >40% after a recent WHF event.
- To assess the impact on NT-proBNP levels and a composite hierarchical outcome including cardiovascular death, HF hospitalizations, and urgent HF visits.
Main Methods:
- The PARAGLIDE-HF trial was a double-blind, randomized controlled study.
- Patients with EF >40% were enrolled within 30 days of a WHF event and randomized to sacubitril/valsartan or valsartan.
- The primary endpoint was the time-averaged proportional change in NT-proBNP; a secondary hierarchical outcome was analyzed using a win ratio.
Main Results:
- Sacubitril/valsartan showed a significantly greater reduction in NT-proBNP compared to valsartan (P=0.049).
- The hierarchical outcome favored sacubitril/valsartan but did not reach statistical significance (P=0.16).
- Sacubitril/valsartan reduced worsening renal function but increased symptomatic hypotension; a larger treatment effect was observed in patients with EF ≤60%.
Conclusions:
- In stabilized patients with EF >40% post-WHF, sacubitril/valsartan achieved greater NT-proBNP reduction and showed clinical benefits versus valsartan.
- Despite increased symptomatic hypotension, sacubitril/valsartan offers a potential therapeutic option for this patient population.
- Further research may explore optimal patient selection, particularly for those with EF ≤60%.
Background:
U.S. guidelines recommend consideration of sacubitril/valsartan in chronic heart failure (HF) and mildly reduced or preserved ejection fraction (EF). Whether initiation is safe and effective in EF >40% after a worsening heart failure (WHF) event is unknown.
Objectives:
PARAGLIDE-HF (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF) assessed sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan in EF >40% following a recent WHF event.
Methods:
PARAGLIDE-HF is a double-blind, randomized controlled trial of sacubitril/valsartan vs valsartan in patients with EF >40% enrolled within 30 days of a WHF event. The primary endpoint was time-averaged proportional change in amino terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) from baseline through Weeks 4 and 8. A secondary hierarchical outcome (win ratio) consisted of: 1) cardiovascular death; 2) HF hospitalizations; 3) urgent HF visits; and 4) change in NT-proBNP.
Results:
In 466 patients (233 sacubitril/valsartan; 233 valsartan), time-averaged reduction in the NT-proBNP was greater with sacubitril/valsartan (ratio of change: 0.85; 95% CI: 0.73-0.999; P = 0.049). The hierarchical outcome favored sacubitril/valsartan but was not significant (unmatched win ratio: 1.19; 95% CI: 0.93-1.52; P = 0.16). Sacubitril/valsartan reduced worsening renal function (OR: 0.61; 95% CI: 0.40-0.93) but increased symptomatic hypotension (OR: 1.73; 95% CI: 1.09-2.76). There was evidence of a larger treatment effect in the subgroup with EF ≤60% for NT-proBNP change (0.78; 95% CI: 0.61-0.98) and the hierarchical outcome (win ratio: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.09-1.95).
Conclusions:
Among patients with EF >40% stabilized after WHF, sacubitril/valsartan led to greater reduction in plasma NT-proBNP levels and was associated with clinical benefit compared with valsartan alone, despite more symptomatic hypotension. (Prospective comparison of ARNI with ARB Given following stabiLization In DEcompensated HFpEF; NCT03988634).
Related Concept Videos
Heart Failure Drugs: Inhibitors of Renin-Angiotensin System
Heart Failure V: Medical Management
Antihypertensive Drugs: Angiotensin-Converting Enzyme Inhibitors
Heart Failure Drugs: Diuretics
Heart Failure Drugs: β-Blockers
Heart Failure II: Pathophysiology

