Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025
Retinal Pigment Epithelium Transplantation in a Non-human Primate Model for Degenerative Retinal Diseases
Published on: June 14, 2021
Retinal Displacement after Scleral Buckle versus Combined Buckle and Vitrectomy for Rhegmatogenous Retinal
Aditya Bansal1, Sumana C Naidu1, Samara B Marafon1
1Department of Ophthalmology, St. Michael's Hospital/Unity Health Toronto, Toronto, Canada; Department of Ophthalmology and Vision Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, Canada.
Purpose:
To assess the risk of retinal displacement after scleral buckle (SB) versus pars plana vitrectomy with SB (PPV-SB).
Design:
Multicenter prospective nonrandomized clinical trial.
Methods:
The study took place at VitreoRetinal Surgery in Minneapolis, Minnesota, Sankara Nethralaya in Chennai, India, and St. Michael's Hospital in Toronto, Canada from July 2019 to February 2022. Patients who underwent successful SB or PPV-SB for fovea-involving rhegmatogenous retinal detachment with gradable postoperative fundus autofluorescence (FAF) imaging were included in the final analysis. Two masked graders assessed FAF images 3 months postoperatively. Metamorphopsia and aniseikonia were assessed with M-CHARTs and the New Aniseikonia Test, respectively. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with retinal displacement detected with retinal vessel printings on FAF in SB versus PPV-SB.
Results:
Ninety-one eyes were included in this study, of which 46.2% (42 of 91) had SB and 53.8% (49 of 91) underwent PPV-SB. Three months postoperatively, 16.7% (7 of 42) in the SB group and 38.8% (19 of 49) in the PPV-SB group had evidence of retinal displacement (difference = 22.1%; odds ratio = 3.2; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.2-8.6; P = 0.02) on FAF. The statistical significance of this association increased after adjustment for extent of retinal detachment, baseline logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution, lens status, and sex in a multivariate regression analysis (P = 0.01). Retinal displacement was detected in 22.5% (6 of 27) of patients in the SB group with external subretinal fluid drainage and 6.7% (1 of 15) of patients without external drainage (difference = 15.8%; odds ratio = 4.0; 95% CI, 0.4-36.9; P = 0.19). Mean vertical metamorphopsia, horizontal metamorphopsia (MH), and aniseikonia were similar between patients in the SB and PPV-SB groups. There was a trend to worse MH in patients with retinal displacement versus those without retinal displacement (P = 0.067).
Conclusions:
Scleral buckle is associated with less retinal displacement compared with PPV-SB, indicating that traditional PPV techniques cause retinal displacement. There is a trend toward increased risk of retinal displacement in SB eyes that underwent external drainage compared with SB eyes without drainage, which is consistent with our understanding that the iatrogenic movement of subretinal fluid, such as that which occurs intraoperatively during external drainage with SB, may induce retinal stretch and displacement if the retina is then fixed in the stretched position. There was a trend to worse MH at 3 months in patients with retinal displacement.
Financial Disclosure(S):
The author(s) have no proprietary or commercial interest in any materials discussed in this article.
