Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

State of the Art Cranial Ultrasound Imaging in Neonates
Published on: February 2, 2015
Photon-counting versus Dual-Source CT of Congenital Heart Defects in Neonates and Infants: Initial Experience
Timm Dirrichs1, Eric Tietz1, André Rüffer1
1From the Department of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology (T.D., E.T., E.D., C.K.K.), Department of Pediatric Heart Surgery (A.R., T.D.N.), and Department of Pediatric Cardiology (J.H.), RWTH Aachen University Hospital, Pauwelsstr 30, 52074 Aachen, Germany.
Insights
Photon-counting CT (PCCT) provides superior cardiovascular imaging in children compared to dual-source CT (DSCT). PCCT offers improved image quality with higher signal-to-noise and contrast-to-noise ratios at similar radiation doses.
Area of Science:
- Medical Imaging
- Pediatric Radiology
- Cardiovascular Imaging
Background:
- Photon-counting CT (PCCT) shows promise for enhancing cardiovascular CT imaging in adults.
- Limited data exists on PCCT's efficacy in pediatric populations, specifically neonates, infants, and young children.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the image quality and radiation dose of ultrahigh-pitch PCCT versus ultrahigh-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT).
- To evaluate these techniques in children with suspected congenital heart defects.
Main Methods:
- Prospective analysis of contrast-enhanced PCCT or DSCT scans in 113 children (median age 66 days) with suspected congenital heart defects.
- Image quality assessed using signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR), and visual scoring by four readers.
- Effective radiation dose calculated using CT dose index and dose-length product.
Main Results:
- PCCT (n=30) achieved diagnostic image quality (score ≥3) in 97% of cases, compared to 77% for DSCT (n=84).
- PCCT demonstrated significantly higher mean image quality ratings (4.17 vs 3.16), SNR (46.3 vs 29.9), and CNR (62.0 vs 37.2) than DSCT (all P<0.01).
- Mean effective radiation doses were comparable between PCCT (0.50 mSv) and DSCT (0.52 mSv) (P=0.47).
Conclusions:
- Ultrahigh-pitch PCCT offers superior cardiovascular imaging quality in children with suspected congenital heart defects compared to ultrahigh-pitch DSCT.
- PCCT achieves this improvement with significantly higher SNR and CNR at similar radiation doses.
- These findings support the potential of PCCT for pediatric cardiovascular imaging.
Abstract:
Background Photon-counting CT (PCCT) has been shown to improve cardiovascular CT imaging in adults. Data in neonates, infants, and young children under the age of 3 years are missing. Purpose To compare image quality and radiation dose of ultrahigh-pitch PCCT with that of ultrahigh-pitch dual-source CT (DSCT) in children suspected of having congenital heart defects. Materials and Methods This is a prospective analysis of existing clinical CT studies in children suspected of having congenital heart defects who underwent contrast-enhanced PCCT or DSCT in the heart and thoracic aorta between January 2019 and October 2022. CT dose index and dose-length product were used to calculate effective radiation dose. Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) were calculated by standardized region-of-interest analysis. SNR and CNR dose ratios were calculated. Visual image quality was assessed by four independent readers on a five-point scale: 5, excellent or absent; 4, good or minimal; 3, moderate; 2, limited or substantial; and 1, poor or massive. Results Contrast-enhanced PCCT (n = 30) or DSCT (n = 84) was performed in 113 children (55 female and 58 male participants; median age, 66 days [IQR, 15-270]; median height, 56 cm [IQR, 52-67]; and median weight, 4.5 kg [IQR, 3.4-7.1]). A diagnostic image quality score of at least 3 was obtained in 29 of 30 (97%) with PCCT versus 65 of 84 (77%) with DSCT. Mean overall image quality ratings were higher for PCCT versus DSCT (4.17 vs 3.16, respectively; P < .001). SNR and CNR were higher for PCCT versus DSCT with SNR (46.3 ± 16.3 vs 29.9 ± 15.3, respectively; P = .007) and CNR (62.0 ± 50.3 vs 37.2 ± 20.8, respectively; P = .001). Mean effective radiation doses were similar for PCCT and DSCT (0.50 mSv vs 0.52 mSv; P = .47). Conclusion At a similar radiation dose, PCCT offers a higher SNR and CNR and thus better cardiovascular imaging quality than DSCT in children suspected of having cardiac heart defects. © RSNA, 2023.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Computed Tomography
The technique was invented in the 1970s and is based on the principle that as X-rays pass through the body, they are absorbed or reflected at different levels. In the technique, a patient lies on a motorized platform while a computerized axial tomography (CAT) scanner rotates...
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System II:Types of Echocardiography
Types of Echocardiography
Transthoracic Echocardiography (TTE)
TTE is the most common type of echocardiogram which involves placing a transducer on the patient's chest, emitting sound waves to create heart images. TTE is invaluable for evaluating the heart's size, structure, and motion, making it particularly useful for...

