Search research articles

ABOUT JoVE

Overview Leadership Blog JoVE Help Center

AUTHORS

Publishing Process Editorial Board Scope & Policies Peer Review FAQ Submit

LIBRARIANS

Testimonials Subscriptions Access Resources Library Advisory Board FAQ

RESEARCH

JoVE Journal Methods Collections JoVE Encyclopedia of Experiments Archive

EDUCATION

JoVE Core JoVE Business JoVE Science Education JoVE Lab Manual Faculty Resource Center Faculty Site

Terms & Conditions of Use

Related Concept Videos

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-Report Tests of Personality

Self-report inventories are objective personality assessments that use multiple-choice items or numbered scales, typically ranging from 1 (strongly disagree) to 5 (strongly agree). They are often called Likert scales after Rensis Likert. These inventories are widely used due to their ease of administration and cost-effectiveness. One of the most prominent examples is the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI), initially developed in the 1940s to assess abnormal personality traits.

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping

People can go to great lengths to protect their self-image and present themselves in ways that they want others to see them. Sociologist Erving Goffman presented the idea that a person is like an actor on a stage. Calling his theory dramaturgy, Goffman believed that we use “impression management” to present ourselves to others as we hope to be perceived. Each situation is a new scene, and individuals perform different roles depending on who is present (Goffman, 1959). Think about...

Fundamental Attribution Error

Fundamental Attribution Error

According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...

Self-Discrepancy Theory

Self-Discrepancy Theory

One influential perspective on what motivates people's behavior is detailed in Tory Higgin's self-discrepancy theory (Higgins, 1987). He proposed that people hold disagreeing internal representations of themselves that lead to different emotional states.

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Self-Evaluation: Self-Enhancement and Self-Verification

Social psychologists have documented that feeling good about ourselves and maintaining positive self-esteem is a powerful motivator of human behavior (Tavris & Aronson, 2008). In the United States, members of the predominant culture typically think very highly of themselves and view themselves as good people who are above average on many desirable traits (Ehrlinger, Gilovich, & Ross, 2005). Often, our behavior, attitudes, and beliefs are affected when we experience a threat to our...

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Stereotypes, Prejudice, and Discrimination

Humans are very diverse and although we share many similarities, we also have many differences. The social groups we belong to help form our identities (Tajfel, 1974). These differences may be difficult for some people to reconcile, which may lead to prejudice toward people who are different. Prejudice is a negative attitude and feeling toward an individual based solely on one’s membership in a particular social group (Allport, 1954; Brown, 2010). Prejudice is common against people who...

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by

Same author

Environmental Bridgebuilding: Connecting People Through Nature Conservation. The Example of the Barn Owl.

Ecology and evolution·2026

Same author

The stability of colour-emotion associations across colour presentation modes and experimental settings.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026

Same author

Favourite and Least Favourite Colours Tell Different Stories: Testing the Ecological Valence Theory.

Quarterly journal of experimental psychology (2006)·2026

Same author

High confidence, low accuracy: Younger and older adults overestimate lie detection performance.

Psychology and aging·2025

Same author

Advice-taking in carbon footprint assessments: How psychological and cultural factors shape reliance on experts' advice.

British journal of psychology (London, England : 1953)·2025

Same author

Free Association Database for a 62-Word Dataset Including Emotion and Colour Terms in English, Estonian, French, German, Italian, Lithuanian, and Spanish: Data from 14 Countries.

Journal of open psychology data·2025

Search research articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 29, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

Individual differences in self-reported lie detection abilities.

Mélanie Fernandes¹, Domicele Jonauskaite^1,2, Frédéric Tomas³

¹Institute of Psychology, University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.

|May 24, 2023

Summary

This summary is machine-generated.

People generally guess lies accurately, yet overestimate their own lie detection skills. Lower trust in others and higher social desirability correlate with overestimating personal deception detection abilities.

More Related Videos

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 29, 2025

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

An Experimental Analysis of Children's Ability to Provide a False Report about a Crime

Published on: May 3, 2016

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

The Modified Temptation Resistance Task: A Paradigm to Elicit Children's Strategic Lie-telling

Published on: April 6, 2018

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Holistic Facial Composite Creation and Subsequent Video Line-up Eyewitness Identification Paradigm

Published on: December 24, 2015

Area of Science:

Psychology
Social Psychology
Behavioral Science

Background:

Group-level lie detection accuracy is at chance.
Individuals often report high self-assessed lie detection abilities, creating a paradox.
Accurate deception detection is crucial for legal and social trust.

Purpose of the Study:

Investigate individual differences influencing self-reported lie detection.
Understand the psychological factors behind the lie detection paradox.

Main Methods:

Two online studies assessed personality traits (Big-Six, Dark Triad), empathy, emotional intelligence, cultural values, trust, and social desirability.
Correlated these individual differences with self-reported lie detection abilities.

Main Results:

Self-reported lie detection abilities consistently exceeded chance levels.
Lower out-group trust and higher social desirability significantly predicted higher self-reported lie detection.
Personality traits, empathy, and emotional intelligence did not predict self-reported accuracy.

Conclusions:

Beliefs about personal lie detection are influenced by social factors, not necessarily actual ability.
Social trust and norms play a role in shaping self-perceptions of deception detection.
The study highlights the discrepancy between perceived and actual lie detection skills.