SBAR I: Understanding the Concept
Types of Reports I: Hands-off Report
Types of Reports III: Telephone and Verbal Reports
SBAR II: Application of SBAR
Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation II: ACLS Airway Management
Techniques of Therapeutic Communication II: Focusing, Paraphrasing, and Summarizing
You might also read
Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Setting Up a Stroke Team Algorithm and Conducting Simulation-based Training in the Emergency Department - A Practical Guide
Published on: January 15, 2017
Shaun Cowan1, Patrick Murphy2, Michael Kim2
1From the Department of Surgery, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alb. (Cowan, Kim, Mador, Verhoeff, Widder); the Department of Surgery, Indiana University, Indianapolis, Indianna (Murphy); the Department of Critical Care, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alb. (Cowan, Kim, Widder); the Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alb. (Chang, Kabaroff); the Alberta Emergency Medical Services, Alberta Health Services, Edmonton, Alb. (Cameron); and the Shock Trauma Air Rescue Society, Alberta, Edmonton, Alb. (Cowan, North) cowan@ualberta.ca.
Standardized trauma handover formats like IMIST and ISOBAR are preferred over ad-lib communication. Key factors for effective trauma care include vital signs, logical structure, and minimizing distractions during patient transfer.
Area of Science:
Background:
Purpose of the Study:
Main Methods:
Main Results:
Conclusions: