Misunderstood terms and concepts identified through user testing of educational materials for fragile X premutation:
Beth Lincoln-Boyea1, Rebecca R Moultrie2, Barbara B Biesecker1
1Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Translational Research Center, RTI International, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina, USA.
Insights
Understanding fragile X premutation (FMR1) requires clear educational materials. User testing revealed persistent challenges in comprehending genetic terms and implications, highlighting the need for refined resources.
Area of Science:
- Genetics and Genetic Diseases
- Public Health and Epidemiology
- Health Communication and Education
Background:
- The FMR1 premutation presents complex genetic mechanisms and health risks, complicating newborn diagnosis and patient education.
- North Carolina implemented a research study (Oct 2018–Dec 2021) offering voluntary expanded newborn screening for FMR1 premutation.
- The study provided crucial confirmatory testing, parental testing, and genetic counseling services.
Purpose of the Study:
- To develop and refine web-based educational materials for parents regarding the FMR1 premutation.
- To assess the understandability of these materials through iterative user testing with parents.
- To identify and address specific misconceptions and comprehension challenges related to fragile X genetics.
Main Methods:
- Development of web-based educational resources to supplement genetic counseling for FMR1 premutation.
- Conducted three rounds of iterative user testing interviews with 25 parents having a college degree or less.
- Utilized content analysis of interview transcripts to iteratively refine materials and achieve findings saturation.
Main Results:
- Commonly misunderstood terms included 'fragile' and 'carrier'; initial misconceptions about the 'fragile X gene' were noted.
- Participants struggled to grasp the relationship between FMR1 premutation and fragile X syndrome.
- Website layout, formatting, and graphics significantly influenced comprehension, with some understandability issues persisting despite revisions.
Conclusions:
- Iterative user testing is essential for identifying and rectifying misconceptions in genetic educational materials.
- Developing understandable, evidence-based parental resources for conditions like FMR1 premutation requires a user-centered approach.
- Addressing persistent educational challenges and potential expert bias is crucial for effective genetic information dissemination.
Abstract:
Complicated genetic mechanisms and unpredictable health risks associated with the FMR1 premutation can result in challenges for patient education when the diagnosis is made in a newborn. From October 15, 2018, to December 10, 2021, North Carolina parents could obtain FMR1 premutation results about their newborns through a voluntary expanded newborn screening research study. The study provided confirmatory testing, parental testing, and genetic counseling. We developed web-based educational materials to augment information about fragile X premutation conveyed by a genetic counselor. Many genetics education materials are developed for the lay population. However, relatively little research is published on how well individuals understand these materials. We conducted three rounds of iterative user testing interviews to help refine web-based educational materials that support understanding and self-paced learning. The participants included 25 parents with a 2-year college degree or less and without a child identified with fragile X syndrome, premutation, or gray-zone allele. Content analysis of interview transcripts resulted in iterative changes and ultimately saturation of findings. Across all rounds of interviews, there were two terms that were commonly misunderstood (fragile and carrier) and two terms that elicited initial misconceptions that were overcome by participants. Many also had difficulty understanding the relationship between fragile X premutation and fragile X syndrome as well as appreciating the implications of having a "fragile X gene." Website layout, formatting, and graphics also influenced comprehension. Despite iterative changes to the content, certain issues with understandability persisted. The findings support the need for user testing to identify misconceptions that may interfere with understanding and using genetic information. Here, we describe a process used to develop and refine evidence-based, understandable parental resources on fragile X premutation. Additionally, we provide recommendations to address ongoing educational challenges and discuss the potential impact of bias on the part of expert content developers.
More Related Videos
11:10Dissecting Cell-Autonomous Function of Fragile X Mental Retardation Protein in an Auditory Circuit by In Ovo Electroporation
Published on: July 6, 2022
10:59Generation and Characterization of Human Induced Pluripotent Stem Cell-derived Astrocytes Lacking Fragile X Messenger Ribonucleoprotein
Published on: June 6, 2025
Related Concept Videos
Sex-linked Disorders
Genomic Imprinting and Inheritance
The expression of some genes depends on which parent passed the gene to the offspring, through a phenomenon known as...
X-Inactivation
Amyloid Fibrils
Amyloid deposits were observed as early as 1639 in the liver and the spleen. In 1854, Rudolph Virchow performed iodine staining,...
X-linked Traits
Pedigree Analysis
