Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 29, 2025

Biological Compatibility Profile on Biomaterials for Bone Regeneration
Published on: November 16, 2018
An Immunologic and Biomechanical Comparison of Polyether Ether Ketone-Zeolite and Polyether Ether Ketone Interbody
Boyle C Cheng1, Isaac Swink, Edward J McClain
1Allegheny Health Network Research Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.
Study Design:
A laboratory study comparing polyether ether ketone (PEEK)-zeolite and PEEK spinal implants in an ovine model.
Objective:
This study challenges a conventional spinal implant material, PEEK, to PEEK-zeolite using a nonplated cervical ovine model.
Summary Of Background Data:
Although widely used for spinal implants due to its material properties, PEEK is hydrophobic, resulting in poor osseointegration, and elicits a mild nonspecific foreign body response. Zeolites are negatively charged aluminosilicate materials that are hypothesized to reduce this pro-inflammatory response when used as a compounding material with PEEK.
Materials And Methods:
Fourteen skeletally mature sheep were, each, implanted with one PEEK-zeolite interbody device and one PEEK interbody device. Both devices were packed with autograft and allograft material and randomly assigned to one of 2 cervical disc levels. The study involved 2 survival time points (12 and 26 weeks) and biomechanical, radiographic, and immunologic endpoints. One sheep expired from complications not related to the device or procedure. A biomechanical evaluation was based on measures of segmental flexibility, using 6 degrees of freedom pneumatic spine tester. Radiographic evaluation was performed using microcomputed tomography scans in a blinded manner by 3 physicians. Levels of the pro-inflammatory cytokines, interleukin (IL)-1β, IL-6, and tumor necrosis factor-alpha at the implant, were quantified using immunohistochemistry.
Results:
PEEK-zeolite and PEEK exhibited an equivalent range of motion in flexion extension, lateral bending, and axial torsion. A motion was significantly reduced for implanted devices at both time points as compared with native segments. Radiographic assessments of fusion and bone formation were similar for both devices. PEEK-zeolite exhibited lower levels of IL-1β ( P = 0.0003) and IL-6 ( P = 0.03).
Conclusion:
PEEK-zeolite interbody fusion devices provide initial fixation substantially equivalent to PEEK implants but exhibit a reduced pro-inflammatory response. PEEK-zeolite devices may reduce the chronic inflammation and fibrosis previously observed with PEEK devices.
More Related Videos
04:37Author Spotlight: Advancing Research on Candida albicans Biofilm-Associated Prosthetic Joint Infections
Published on: February 2, 2024
09:07An Anesthesia, Surgery, and Harvest Method for the Evaluation of Transpedicular Screws Using an In Vivo Porcine Lumbar Spine Model
Published on: May 31, 2017