Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 28, 2025

07:53
Group Synchronization During Collaborative Drawing Using Functional Near-Infrared Spectroscopy
Published on: August 5, 2022
2.1K
Teams moving more synchronously are perceived as socially dominant
Justin W Bonny1, Anya M Jones1
1Department of Psychology, Morgan State University, USA.
Acta Psychologica
|May 29, 2023
Summary
Observers judge team dominance by how well teams move together. Increased movement synchrony in teams, whether animated or human-like, leads to perceptions of greater dominance and a higher likelihood of winning social conflicts.
Area of Science:
- Social psychology
- Behavioral science
- Human-computer interaction
Background:
- Social dominance is often inferred from observable characteristics of individuals and groups.
- Movement synchrony among individuals has been linked to perceptions of group effectiveness and formidability.
- The role of movement synchrony as a direct cue for judging team dominance in social conflicts remains underexplored.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate whether human observers utilize movement synchrony as a cue to assess the social dominance of teams during social conflicts.
- To determine if synchronized movement influences perceptions of a team's likelihood to win a competition.
Main Methods:
- Four experiments were conducted using animated characters and human-like avatars performing various movements and dance actions.
- Participants observed teams exhibiting different levels of movement synchrony.
- Judgments of team dominance and likelihood of winning competitions were collected.
Main Results:
- Teams exhibiting higher movement synchrony were consistently rated as more dominant by observers.
- Synchronized movement positively correlated with perceived likelihood of winning a competition across different stimuli types.
- These findings were replicated across experiments using diverse animated and human-like characters.
Conclusions:
- Human observers actively use movement synchrony as a key indicator of team social dominance.
- Movement synchrony serves as a predictive cue for team power and success in social conflict scenarios.
- This research broadens the understanding of behavioral cues used to evaluate group dynamics and power.
Related Concept Videos
Relationship Formation
40.2K
What do you think is the single most influential factor in determining with whom you become friends and whom you form romantic relationships? You might be surprised to learn that the answer is simple: the people with whom you have the most contact. This most important factor is proximity. You are more likely to be friends with people you have regular contact with. For example, there are decades of research that shows that you are more likely to become friends with people who live in your dorm,...
40.2K
Social Facilitation
32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
Social Loafing
34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Nonconscious Mimicry
4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Social Exchange Theory
34.6K
We have discussed why we form relationships, what attracts us to others, and different types of love. But what determines whether we are satisfied with and stay in a relationship? One theory that provides an explanation is social exchange theory. According to social exchange theory, we act as naïve economists in keeping a tally of the ratio of costs and benefits of forming and maintaining a relationship with others (Rusbult & Van Lange, 2003).
34.6K
In- and Out-Groups
39.1K
People all belong to a gender, race, age, and social economic group. These groups provide a powerful source of our identity and self-esteem (Tajfel & Turner, 1979) and serve as our in-groups. An in-group is a group that we identify with or see ourselves as belonging to.
39.1K

