Advertising Alternative Cancer Treatments and Approaches on Meta Social Media Platforms: Content Analysis
Marco Zenone1, Jeremy Snyder2, Jean-Christophe Bélisle-Pipon2
1Faculty of Public Health and Policy, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
Alternative cancer providers extensively advertise scientifically unsupported treatments on Meta platforms, often mimicking legitimate medical providers. These ads exploit patient hope, highlighting unproven cures and longevity claims.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Digital Health
- Medical Ethics
Background:
- Alternative cancer treatments carry a higher mortality risk compared to conventional therapies.
- Anecdotal evidence suggests social media is used for promoting alternative cancer treatments, but the scope is unknown.
- There is an urgent need to investigate the advertising of alternative cancer treatments on social media platforms.
Purpose of the Study:
- To systematically analyze advertising activities of alternative cancer treatment providers on Meta platforms (Facebook, Instagram, Messenger, Audience Network).
- To determine the presence, strategies, and messaging of paid alternative cancer treatment advertisements.
- To evaluate how the efficacy of alternative treatments is portrayed in these advertisements.
Main Methods:
- Collected active advertisements from alternative cancer clinics via the Meta Ad Library between December 6-12, 2021.
- Gathered data including ad ID, URL, status, dates, advertiser name, and ad visuals (image/video).
- Conducted content analysis to assess communication strategies, claimed benefits, and efficacy portrayal.
Main Results:
- Identified 310 paid ads from 11 clinics promoting alternative cancer treatments on Meta platforms.
- Top advertising strategies included posing as legitimate providers (93.2%), targeting those with limited options (65.5%), and using client testimonials (54.2%).
- 25.8% of ads claimed their treatments could cure cancer or prolong life, often referencing "alternative" and "natural" approaches.
Conclusions:
- Alternative cancer providers utilize Meta advertising to market unproven treatments, often appearing as legitimate medical options.
- Advertisements exploit patient hope through testimonials and claims of cures, despite lacking scientific support.
- Recommended mandatory human-led authorization for medical advertisers on Meta and further research into platform conflicts of interest with public health.
More Related Videos
07:47Author Spotlight: Unveiling Transmembrane Protein Family-Related Markers in Gastric Cancer and Implications for Targeted Therapies
Published on: September 15, 2023
08:53Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
Published on: May 31, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cancer Therapies
However, cancer treatments can pose several challenges, as therapies used to kill cancer cells are generally also toxic to normal cells. Moreover, cancer cells mutate rapidly and can develop resistance to chemical agents or radiation therapy. Besides, all types of cancer cells may not respond to the same therapy. Some cancer cells respond to one...
Adaptive Mechanisms in Cancer Cells
Some of the advantages that cancer cells have on normal cells include - enhanced ability to divide without terminally differentiating, induce new blood vessel formation,...
Targeted Cancer Therapies
There are several types of targeted therapies against...
Cancer Survival Analysis
Cancer Prevention
Some...
mTOR Signaling and Cancer Progression
The mTOR pathway or the...
