Outcomes of ATA Low-Risk Pediatric Thyroid Cancer Patients Not Treated With Radioactive Iodine Therapy

Mya Bojarsky1, Julia A Baran1, Stephen Halada1

  • 1Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, The Thyroid Center, Children's Hospital of Philadelphia, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.

Insights

Withholding radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) for pediatric differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) patients classified as low-risk by the American Thyroid Association (ATA) does not lower remission rates. This approach avoids radiation exposure and maintains similar outcomes to RAIT.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Endocrinology
  • Oncology
  • Nuclear Medicine

Background:

  • The American Thyroid Association (ATA) guidelines suggest withholding radioactive iodine therapy (RAIT) for differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) cases confined to the thyroid.
  • Ongoing concerns exist regarding potential impacts on remission rates when RAIT is withheld for pediatric DTC patients.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate whether withholding RAIT in ATA low-risk pediatric DTC patients affects remission rates compared to those receiving RAIT.
  • To evaluate factors influencing RAIT administration and remission outcomes in this cohort.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective review of medical records for patients under 19 diagnosed with DTC and treated with total thyroidectomy (2010-2020).
  • Multivariate logistic regression analysis to identify predictors of RAIT use and remission.
  • Comparison of 1-year and long-term remission rates between patients treated with and without RAIT.

Main Results:

  • Ninety-five low-risk pediatric DTC patients were analyzed; 53% received RAIT, 47% did not.
  • RAIT use decreased significantly after 2015 (82% before vs. 33% after, P < .01).
  • No significant difference in 1-year remission rates was observed (70% with RAIT vs. 69% without RAIT). Long-term remission rates were also comparable (82% vs. 76%).

Conclusions:

  • Withholding RAIT for pediatric low-risk DTC patients is safe and does not negatively impact remission rates.
  • This approach effectively avoids unnecessary radiation exposure.
  • Dynamic risk stratification at 1-year post-treatment is appropriate for assessing outcomes in patients not receiving RAIT.
Abstract