Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Routes of Persuasion02:20

Routes of Persuasion

64.2K
Persuasion is the process of changing our attitude toward something based on some kind of communication. Much of the persuasion we experience comes from outside forces. How do people convince others to change their attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors? What communications do you receive that attempt to persuade you to change your attitudes, beliefs, and behaviors?
64.2K
Reasoning01:30

Reasoning

108
Reasoning is the action of thinking about something in a logical, sensible way. It is integral to problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking. Reasoning can be inductive or deductive. Reasoning involves transforming information into conclusions, which is essential for problem-solving, decision-making, and critical thinking.
Inductive reasoning involves deriving generalizations from specific observations. This type of reasoning helps form beliefs about the world. For example,...
108
Inductive Reasoning00:59

Inductive Reasoning

60.7K
Inductive reasoning is a form of logical thinking that uses related observations to arrive at a general conclusion. It is uncertain and operates in degrees to which the conclusions are credible. As such, inductive arguments can be weak or strong, rather than valid or invalid, and conclusions can be used to formulate testable, falsifiable hypotheses.
Inductive reasoning is common in descriptive science. A life scientist makes observations and records them. This data can be qualitative or...
60.7K
Reason and Intuition01:37

Reason and Intuition

6.5K
The human brain processes information for decision-making using one of two routes: an intuitive system and a rational system (Epstein, 1994; popularized by Kahneman, 2011 as System 1 and System 2, respectively). The intuitive system is quick, impulsive, and operates with minimal effort, relying on emotions or habits to provide cues for what to do next, while the rational system is logical, analytical, deliberate, and methodical. Research in neuropsychology suggests that the...
6.5K
Fundamental Attribution Error01:14

Fundamental Attribution Error

12.9K
According to some social psychologists, people tend to overemphasize internal factors as explanations—or attributions—for the behavior of other people. They tend to assume that the behavior of another person is a trait of that person, and to underestimate the power of the situation on the behavior of others. They tend to fail to recognize when the behavior of another is due to situational variables, and thus to the person’s state. This erroneous assumption is...
12.9K
Confirmation Biases01:31

Confirmation Biases

5.5K
The confirmation bias is the tendency to focus on information that confirms our existing beliefs and ignore information that is inconsistent with our expectations. For example, if you think that your professor is not very nice, you notice all of the instances of rude behavior exhibited by the professor while ignoring the countless pleasant interactions he is involved in on a daily basis. Have you ever fallen prey to the confirmation bias, either as the source or target of such bias?
5.5K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation.

PloS one·2024
Same author

The impact of explanations as communicative acts on belief in a claim: The role of source reliability.

Cognition·2023
Same author

Can counterfactual explanations of AI systems' predictions skew lay users' causal intuitions about the world? If so, can we correct for that?

Patterns (New York, N.Y.)·2022
Same author

Collectives and Epistemic Rationality.

Topics in cognitive science·2022
Same author

The propensity interpretation of probability and diagnostic split in explaining away.

Cognitive psychology·2020
Same author

Widening Access to Bayesian Problem Solving.

Frontiers in psychology·2020
Same journal

Correction to: 'Stokes settling and particle-laden plumes: implications for deep-sea mining and volcanic eruption plumes' (2020), by Mingotti et al.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

A stable hothouse triggered by a tipping mechanism.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Beyond distance: quantifying point cloud dynamics with persistent homology and dynamic optimal transport.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Global stability of the Atlantic overturning circulation: edge state, long transients and boundary crisis under CO2 forcing.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Morse index classification and landscape of Kuramoto system for Hebbian-based binary pattern recognition.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
Same journal

Interpretable and equation-free response theory for complex systems.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 28, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K

Argument and explanation.

Ulrike Hahn1, Marko Tešić1

  • 1Birkbeck, University of London, London, UK.

Philosophical Transactions. Series A, Mathematical, Physical, and Engineering Sciences
|June 4, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

This paper clarifies the relationship between argument and explanation, integrating research from cognitive science and artificial intelligence (AI). It identifies future research directions beneficial for both fields.

Keywords:
argument generationargumentationexplainable artificial intelligenceexplanation

More Related Videos

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

348

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 28, 2025

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients
05:48

The Adventures of Fundi Intervention Based on the Cognitive and Emotional Processing in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Patients

Published on: June 12, 2020

5.8K
Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language
09:27

Using Eye Movements Recorded in the Visual World Paradigm to Explore the Online Processing of Spoken Language

Published on: October 13, 2018

10.1K
Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems
05:47

Evidence-based Knowledge Synthesis and Hypothesis Validation: Navigating Biomedical Knowledge Bases via Explainable AI and Agentic Systems

Published on: June 13, 2025

348

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Science
  • Artificial Intelligence (AI)

Background:

  • Argument and explanation are distinct yet related concepts.
  • Existing research is fragmented across cognitive science and AI.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To clarify the relationship between argument and explanation.
  • To provide an integrative review of existing research.
  • To identify future research directions at the intersection of cognitive science and AI.

Main Methods:

  • Integrative literature review.
  • Synthesis of cognitive science and AI research on argument and explanation.

Main Results:

  • A clarified conceptual relationship between argument and explanation.
  • Identification of key research gaps and opportunities.
  • Highlighting the mutual benefits of interdisciplinary collaboration.

Conclusions:

  • Integrating cognitive science and AI perspectives is crucial for advancing research on argument and explanation.
  • Future research should focus on areas of mutual benefit to both disciplines.