Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing01:13

Accuracy and Errors in Hypothesis Testing

201
Hypothesis testing is a fundamental statistical tool that begins with the assumption that the null hypothesis H0 is true. During this process, two types of errors can occur: Type I and Type II. A Type I error refers to the incorrect rejection of a true null hypothesis, while a Type II error involves the failure to reject a false null hypothesis.
In hypothesis testing, the probability of making a Type I error, denoted as α, is commonly set at 0.05. This significance level indicates a 5%...
201
Accuracy, limits, and approximation01:28

Accuracy, limits, and approximation

454
Accuracy, limits, and approximations are common in many fields, especially in engineering calculations. These concepts are imperative for ensuring that a given value is as close as possible to its true value.
Accuracy is defined as the closeness of the measured value to the true or actual value. In engineering mechanics, repeated measurements are taken during theoretical or experimental analyses to ensure that the result is precise and accurate.
The accuracy of any solution is based on the...
454
Group Polarization01:01

Group Polarization

34.3K
Group polarization is the strengthening of an original group attitude following the discussion of views within a group (Teger & Pruitt, 1967). That is, if a group initially favors a viewpoint, after discussion the group consensus is likely a stronger endorsement of the viewpoint. Conversely, if the group was initially opposed to a viewpoint, group discussion would likely lead to stronger opposition.
34.3K
Accuracy and Precision01:52

Accuracy and Precision

8.9K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value.  Highly accurate...
8.9K
Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision03:37

Uncertainty in Measurement: Accuracy and Precision

73.7K
Scientists typically make repeated measurements of a quantity to ensure the quality of their findings and to evaluate both the precision and the accuracy of their results. Measurements are said to be precise if they yield very similar results when repeated in the same manner. A measurement is considered accurate if it yields a result that is very close to the true or the accepted value. Precise values agree with each other; accurate values agree with a true value. 
73.7K
Social Proof00:52

Social Proof

27.7K
Social proof is a form of persuasion based on comparison and conformity. People compare their behavior and actions to what others are doing and will change to conform to do what their peers do.
27.7K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Argument and explanation.

Philosophical transactions. Series A, Mathematical, physical, and engineering sciences·2023
Same author

Editorial: Public research and private knowledge-Science in times of diverse research funding.

Frontiers in research metrics and analytics·2023
Same author

Collectives and Epistemic Rationality.

Topics in cognitive science·2022
Same author

How Communication Can Make Voters Choose Less Well.

Topics in cognitive science·2018
Same author

How Good Is Your Evidence and How Would You Know?

Topics in cognitive science·2018
Same author

On the ignorance of group-level effects-The tragedy of personnel evaluation?

Journal of experimental psychology. Applied·2018
Same journal

Analysis of strength degradation of coal and rock masses and stability of mined areas under long term immersion environment.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Biogenic Silver-Selenium nanocomposite with anticancer activity and potent efficacy against vancomycin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Preparation and physicochemical characterization of a biodegradable chitosan/carboxymethyl cellulose hydrogel synthesized in NaOH/urea medium.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Action-guilt, survivor-guilt, and depression in combat-related PTSD.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Explainable machine learning for predicting activities of daily living at discharge in stroke patients: A retrospective study using SHAP interpretability.

PloS one·2026
Same journal

Deep learning based two-way feature depiction model for brain tumor detection.

PloS one·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K

Knowledge through social networks: Accuracy, error, and polarisation.

Ulrike Hahn1,2, Christoph Merdes2,3, Momme von Sydow2

  • 1Department of Psychological Sciences, Birkbeck, University of London, London, United Kingdom.

Plos One
|January 3, 2024
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

We often rely on others for knowledge, but assessing source accuracy is difficult. This study shows social networks and source evaluation strategies can increase polarization, even for accuracy-motivated agents.

More Related Videos

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.4K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 6, 2025

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community
08:53

Integrating Computerized Linguistic and Social Network Analyses to Capture Addiction Recovery Capital in an Online Community

Published on: May 31, 2019

5.2K
Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision
07:57

Accuracy in Dental Medicine, A New Way to Measure Trueness and Precision

Published on: April 29, 2014

13.4K
Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias
09:03

Post-Movie Subliminal Measurement PMSM, for Investigating Implicit Social Bias

Published on: February 29, 2020

5.8K

Area of Science:

  • Epistemology
  • Social Network Analysis
  • Computational Social Science

Background:

  • Human knowledge acquisition heavily relies on testimony from others.
  • Accurately evaluating the reliability of information sources is a significant challenge.
  • Understanding how social structures influence belief accuracy is crucial.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the impact of limited source accuracy information on belief formation.
  • To analyze the role of social networks in information dissemination and belief accuracy.
  • To identify mechanisms driving polarization in belief systems.

Main Methods:

  • Agent-based modeling and simulations were employed.
  • Optimal agents were simulated to assess belief accuracy under varying conditions.
  • The influence of social network structures and source evaluation strategies was examined.

Main Results:

  • Social networks can both aid and hinder the accuracy of beliefs.
  • Common strategies for gauging source accuracy can lead to polarization.
  • The interaction between social networks and source evaluation amplifies polarization, especially in larger networks.

Conclusions:

  • Limited information on source accuracy poses a fundamental challenge to knowledge acquisition.
  • Social networks and common evaluation heuristics can inadvertently foster polarization.
  • This research offers a potential explanation for increased societal polarization observed with social media growth.