Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Combination of Microstereolithography and Electrospinning to Produce Membranes Equipped with Niches for Corneal Regeneration
Published on: September 12, 2014
Personalized 3D-printed amniotic fornical ring for ocular surface reconstruction
Nan Zhang1, Ruixing Liu1, Xiaowu Liu1
1Henan Eye Hospital, Henan Provincial People's Hospital, People's Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou 450003, China.
Personalized 3D-printed polylactic acid amniotic fornical rings (AFR) offer a cost-effective and faster surgical option for ocular surface reconstruction compared to traditional sutured amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT). This innovation shows promise for improving patient outcomes and reducing healthcare costs.
Area of Science:
- Ophthalmology
- Biomaterials Science
- Regenerative Medicine
Background:
- Ocular surface diseases often require amniotic membrane transplantation (AMT) for reconstruction.
- Conventional sutured AMT (SAMT) can be time-consuming and costly.
- There is a need for innovative, efficient, and cost-effective solutions for ocular surface reconstruction.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the efficacy and cost-effectiveness of personalized 3D-printed polylactic acid amniotic fornical rings (AFR) for ocular surface reconstruction.
- To compare outcomes of 3D-printed AFR-assisted AMT with conventional sutured AMT (SAMT).
Main Methods:
- A retrospective, interventional case series comparing 3D-printed AFR-assisted AMT (31 patients, 40 eyes) with SAMT (19 patients, 22 eyes).
- Analysis included patient epidemiology, operative duration, epithelial healing time, vision changes, morbidity, and costs.
- Indications included chemical burns, thermal burns, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), and toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN).
Main Results:
- No significant differences in corneal epithelial healing percentage or visual acuity outcomes between the groups.
- The 3D-printed AFR group demonstrated significantly shorter operation durations.
- The average cost per eye was significantly lower in the 3D-printed AFR group.
- Mean dissolution time was comparable (AFR: 15 ± 11 days vs. SAMT: 14 ± 7 days).
Conclusions:
- 3D-printed polylactic acid scaffolds are a viable option for AFR devices in treating ocular surface diseases.
- Personalized 3D-printed AFR is superior to conventional SAMT in terms of operation duration and cost-effectiveness.
- This approach can reduce the financial burden on healthcare systems while maintaining comparable clinical outcomes.
More Related Videos
08:16Fabrication of Custom Agarose Wells for Cell Seeding and Tissue Ring Self-assembly Using 3D-Printed Molds
Published on: April 2, 2018
08:00Directed Cellular Self-Assembly to Fabricate Cell-Derived Tissue Rings for Biomechanical Analysis and Tissue Engineering
Published on: November 25, 2011