Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
Published on: August 25, 2023
The Impairment Argument and Future-Like-Ours: A Problematic Dependence
1Saint Mary's University of Minnesota, 700 Terrace Heights, SM 326, Winona, MN, 55987, USA. cbobier@smumn.edu.
Abstract:
In response to criticism of the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion, Bruce Blackshaw and Perry Hendricks appeal to Don Marquis's future-like-ours (FLO) account of the wrongness of killing to explain why knowingly causing fetal impairments is wrong. I argue that wedding the success of the impairment argument to FLO undermines all claims that the impairment argument for the immorality of abortion is novel. Moreover, I argue that relying on FLO when there are alternative explanations for the wrongness of causing FAS begs the question. I conclude, therefore, that the impairment argument remains unsuccessful.
Insights
The impairment argument for abortion
Area of Science:
- Bioethics
- Moral Philosophy
Background:
- Criticism exists regarding the impairment argument for abortion's immorality.
- Blackshaw and Hendricks propose using Don Marquis's future-like-ours (FLO) theory to support this argument.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the novelty and logical consistency of using the FLO account within the impairment argument for abortion.
- To determine if the impairment argument remains successful when relying on the FLO account.
Main Methods:
- Philosophical analysis of the impairment argument and the FLO account.
- Examination of the logical relationship between the impairment argument and FLO.
- Assessment of alternative explanations for the wrongness of causing fetal impairments.
Main Results:
- Linking the impairment argument's success to the FLO account challenges its claim to novelty.
- Utilizing FLO without considering other explanations for fetal impairment constitutes begging the question.
Conclusions:
- The impairment argument for the immorality of abortion, when reliant on the FLO account, is not novel.
- The impairment argument, as presented, remains unsuccessful in establishing the immorality of abortion.
Related Concept Videos
Drug Dependence
Substance Use Disorders Affecting Sleep
Understanding the concepts of physical dependence,...
The Availability Heuristic
Interference and Decay
Interference occurs when competing memories hinder the retrieval of particular information. It can be classified into two types: proactive and retroactive interference. Proactive...
Self-Presentation: Self-Monitoring and Self-Handicapping
Classification of Illness
An illness is a response to a disease in which the person's level of functioning is changed compared with a previous level. The general classification of illness includes acute and chronic.
Acute illness is severe...

