Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

A Protocol to Characterize the Morphological Changes of Clostridium difficile in Response to Antibiotic Treatment
Published on: May 25, 2017
Antimicrobial susceptibility of Clostridioides difficile to omadacycline and comparator antimicrobials
Andrew M Skinner1,2, Laurica A Petrella2, Adam Cheknis2
1Department of Medicine, Loyola University Medical Center, Maywood, IL, USA.
Background:
Omadacycline is a novel aminomethylcycline tetracycline antimicrobial that was approved for the treatment of community-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI) in 2018. Omadacycline has demonstrated a high degree of in vitro activity towards Clostridioides difficile and previous data have hypothesized that use of omadacycline for CABP or ABSSSI may decrease the risk of C. difficile infections.
Objectives:
To compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of omadacycline versus commonly used antimicrobials for the approved indications of use.
Methods:
We compared the antimicrobial activity of eight antimicrobials approved for CABP and ABSSSI against omadacycline by agar dilution on 200 clinically relevant contemporary C. difficile isolates representing local and national prevalent strain types.
Results:
The in vitro omadacycline geometric mean MIC was 0.07 mg/L. Ceftriaxone resistance was noted in >50% of all isolates tested. The epidemic strain group, identified as restriction endonuclease analysis (REA) group BI, was commonly resistant to azithromycin (92%), moxifloxacin (86%) and clindamycin (78%). REA group DH strains had an elevated trimethoprim/sulfamethoxazole geometric mean MIC of 17.30 mg/L compared with the geometric mean MIC of 8.14 mg/L noted in all other isolates. In the REA group BK isolates that had a doxycycline MIC of ≥2 mg/L, the omadacycline MIC was <0.5 mg/L.
Conclusions:
Among 200 contemporary C. difficile isolates, there were no notable elevations in the in vitro omadacycline MIC, indicating a high level of activity towards C. difficile in comparison with commonly used antimicrobials for CABP and ABSSSI.
Insights
Omadacycline shows strong in vitro activity against Clostridioides difficile, a common cause of infections. This novel antibiotic may reduce the risk of C. difficile infections in patients treated for pneumonia or skin infections.
Area of Science:
- Microbiology
- Infectious Diseases
- Pharmacology
Background:
- Omadacycline, a novel aminomethylcycline tetracycline, was approved in 2018 for community-associated bacterial pneumonia (CABP) and acute bacterial skin and skin structure infections (ABSSSI).
- Previous research suggests omadacycline may possess activity against Clostridioides difficile, potentially reducing infection risk.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the in vitro antimicrobial activity of omadacycline against commonly used antimicrobials for CABP and ABSSSI.
- To evaluate omadacycline's efficacy in inhibiting prevalent Clostridioides difficile strains.
Main Methods:
- Agar dilution method was used to test eight approved antimicrobials against omadacycline.
- Two hundred clinically relevant, contemporary Clostridioides difficile isolates were analyzed, representing diverse strain types.
Main Results:
- Omadacycline demonstrated a low geometric mean MIC of 0.07 mg/L against Clostridioides difficile.
- High resistance rates were observed for other antibiotics, including ceftriaxone (>50%), azithromycin (92%), moxifloxacin (86%), and clindamycin (78%) in specific strains.
- Omadacycline maintained low MICs (<0.5 mg/L) even in doxycycline-resistant isolates.
Conclusions:
- Omadacycline exhibits potent in vitro activity against a wide range of contemporary Clostridioides difficile isolates.
- No significant elevations in omadacycline MIC were observed, supporting its potential role in managing infections where C. difficile is a concern.
More Related Videos
Related Concept Videos
Antimicrobial Effectiveness
Antibiotic Selection
Development of Antibiotic Resistance
Drugs Affecting GI Tract Motility: Antimicrobials as Antidiarrheal Agents

