Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Microscopic Replantation of Penile Glans Amputation Due to Circumcision
Published on: June 3, 2022
How Should Clinicians Navigate Decision Making About Genital Reconstructive Surgeries Among Intersex and Transgender
Frances Grimstad1, Jessica Kremen2, Elizabeth R Boskey3
1Pediatric and adolescent gynecologist at Boston Children's Hospital in Massachusetts and an assistant professor of obstetrics, gynecology, and reproductive biology at Harvard Medical School.
Genital reconstructive surgeries (GRS) offer options for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals and those with intersex traits/differences in sex development (I/dsd). Ethical decision-making and informed consent for GRS must prioritize patient autonomy for equitable care.
Area of Science:
- Medical Ethics
- Surgical Innovation
- Gender-Affirming Care
Background:
- Genital reconstructive surgeries (GRS) serve diverse populations, including transgender and gender diverse (TGD) individuals and those with intersex traits/differences in sex development (I/dsd).
- While outcomes may be similar, decision-making processes for GRS vary significantly between TGD and I/dsd individuals and across different life stages.
Purpose of the Study:
- To analyze the ethical considerations in genital reconstructive surgeries (GRS) for transgender and gender diverse (TGD) and intersex/differences in sex development (I/dsd) populations.
- To advocate for reforms in clinical ethics to enhance patient autonomy in the informed consent process for GRS.
Main Methods:
- Review of ethical frameworks governing genital reconstructive surgeries.
- Analysis of decision-making processes in GRS for TGD and I/dsd individuals.
- Examination of sociocultural influences on GRS ethics.
Main Results:
- Current ethical approaches to GRS are heavily influenced by sociocultural views on gender and sexuality.
- Significant disparities exist in the informed consent process for GRS between TGD and I/dsd populations.
- Patient autonomy is not consistently centered in GRS decision-making.
Conclusions:
- Reforming clinical ethics is crucial to center the autonomy of TGD and I/dsd individuals in GRS informed consent.
- Ensuring justice in healthcare requires equitable GRS decision-making and consent processes for all sex and gender diverse individuals.
- Ethical guidelines for GRS must adapt to fully support the rights and choices of TGD and I/dsd individuals throughout their lives.
Related Concept Videos
Psychosurgery
Historical Development of Psychosurgery
In the 1930s, Portuguese neurologist Antonio Egas Moniz introduced a surgical procedure designed...
Kidney Transplant II: Surgical Procedure
Urinary Tract Calculi VI: Surgical Management
Inflammatory Bowel Disease V: Surgical Management
Here are some common surgical interventions for IBD:

