Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Nursing Evaluation01:15

Nursing Evaluation

3.4K
The evaluation stage signals the end of the nursing process. The nurse gathers evaluative data to assess whether or not the patient has attained the expected results. Whereas the nurse collects data in the nursing assessment to identify the patient's health concerns, the evaluation stage data determines if the indicated health issues are resolved. Evaluative data collection includes two sections: the data acquired to evaluate patient outcomes and the time criteria for data collection.
3.4K
Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation01:20

Nursing Process for Patient and Caregiver Teaching III: Evaluation and Documentation

1.8K
Evaluation of the teaching process enables the nurse to determine if the patient's learning needs were met and if training was effective. If the expected outcomes are not met, the care plan is revised, and additional education or reinforcement is provided. Nurses can ask questions after the session or obtain feedback to assess the patient's understanding of the topic.
Nurses can use several methods to evaluate patient outcomes. For example, oral questions can assess cognitive learning,...
1.8K
Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview01:15

Drug Dosage Regimen: Overview

3.6K
A drug dosage regimen describes the specific instructions and schedule for administering a drug to a patient. It considers factors such as drug dosage, frequency, route of administration, and duration of treatment. Designing an appropriate dosage regimen for a patient aims to achieve a target drug concentration at the site of action.
Typically, the starting dose and dosing interval are guided by the manufacturer's recommendations based on clinical trials conducted during and after drug...
3.6K
Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact01:03

Drug Control Governance: Regulatory Bodies and Their Impact

196
Drug control governance involves the oversight and regulation of pharmaceuticals to ensure their safety and efficacy while preventing illegal drug use and trafficking. Regulatory bodies, including the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Union's European Medicines Agency (EMA), play a central role in this process. These agencies evaluate the safety and efficacy of drugs before they can be marketed. They fund clinical trials and assess the benefits and risks associated with...
196
Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I01:30

Accountability and Responsibility of a Nurse I

2.0K
Accountability in nursing is a fundamental principle that underscores the obligation of nurses to take responsibility for their actions and answer for any errors or omissions in patient care. This principle is grounded in the professional, legal, and ethical frameworks that shape nursing practice. For instance, nurses must adhere to all relevant laws, regulations, and practice standards, including guidelines set forth by nursing boards and professional bodies, to ensure their actions comply...
2.0K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

A 10-year follow-up survey study: burnout in U.S. pharmacy practice faculty, where do we stand?

BMC medical education·2026
Same author

FLEXIBLE WORK ARRANGEMENTS IN PHARMACY ACADEMIA - AN OVERDUE IMPERATIVE.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

The Elephant in the Room: Reckoning With Collegiality and Authorship in Academic Pharmacy.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

Integration of Specialty Pharmacy in U.S. Pharmacy Curricula: A Survey of Didactic and Experiential Education.

Currents in pharmacy teaching & learning·2026
Same author

Evaluating NAPLEX Preparation and Outcomes: A Multi-Institutional Study of Recent Pharmacy Graduates.

American journal of pharmaceutical education·2026
Same author

As-Needed Medication Use for Agitation Across Valproic Acid Formulations.

Current therapeutic research, clinical and experimental·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.0K

Perceptions and Practices for Evaluating Faculty Workload by Pharmacy Education Administration/Leadership.

Lisa Lebovitz1, Sharon K Park2, Surajit Dey3

  • 1University of Maryland School of Pharmacy, Baltimore, MD, USA.

American Journal of Pharmaceutical Education
|June 8, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Faculty workload in academia is inconsistently defined and measured. Many institutions lack clear policies, leading to variable expectations and a need for evidence-based workload metrics for better management.

Keywords:
Department chairEquityWorkload

More Related Videos

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 27, 2025

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education
10:07

Using Learning Outcome Measures to assess Doctoral Nursing Education

Published on: June 21, 2010

19.0K
Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques
13:44

Project-Based Learning Guidelines for Health Sciences Students: An Analysis with Data Mining and Qualitative Techniques

Published on: December 9, 2022

3.6K
Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity
07:32

Use of Galvanic Skin Responses, Salivary Biomarkers, and Self-reports to Assess Undergraduate Student Performance During a Laboratory Exam Activity

Published on: February 10, 2016

9.4K

Area of Science:

  • Higher Education Administration
  • Academic Management
  • Faculty Development

Background:

  • Faculty workload is a critical component of academic administration.
  • Understanding how workload is defined, measured, and evaluated is essential for institutional effectiveness.
  • Current practices in faculty workload management may lack standardization.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the current practices of department chairs and administrators in defining, measuring, and evaluating faculty workload.
  • To identify variations in faculty workload policies and their impact across academic institutions.

Main Methods:

  • A survey was distributed to department chairs/administrators in pharmacy programs.
  • The survey assessed decision-making roles, workload policies, calculation methods, and satisfaction measurement.
  • Data from 64 participants across 52 institutions were analyzed.

Main Results:

  • Only half of participants reported clear, written faculty workload quantification processes.
  • Significant differences in time allocation were observed between practice and non-practice departments.
  • Faculty satisfaction with workload fairness is largely unmeasured, with high variability in expectations.

Conclusions:

  • There is a need for standardized, evidence-based faculty workload metrics.
  • Improved workload management can support personnel decisions and resource allocation.
  • Clear policies and consistent evaluation are crucial for faculty equity and satisfaction.