Participatory Logic Modeling in a Multi-Site Initiative to Advance Implementation Science

Area of Science:

• Program Evaluation
• Public Health Initiatives
• Implementation Science

Background:

• Logic models are increasingly developed using participatory approaches for greater input from program implementers.
• Funders have rarely employed participatory logic modeling for multi-site initiatives.
• This case study details a funder and evaluator engaging funded organizations in developing a multi-site initiative's logic model.

Approach:

• A case study of the Implementation Science Centers in Cancer Control (ISC3) initiative was collectively developed by representatives from seven funded centers.
• The Cross-Center Evaluation (CCE) Work Group articulated the logic model development and refinement process.
• Individual centers described their review and utilization of the logic model, with cross-cutting themes identified through group meetings and writing.

Key Points:

• The ISC3 logic model underwent significant changes based on input from funded groups.
• Authentic participation fostered strong buy-in and utilization of the logic model by the centers.
• Centers adapted their evaluation designs and programmatic strategies to align with the logic model's expectations.

Conclusions:

• Participatory logic modeling offers mutual benefits for funders, grantees, and evaluators in multi-site initiatives.
• Funded groups provide crucial insights into feasibility, required resources, and contextual factors influencing success.
• Grantees' co-development of logic models improves their understanding of funder expectations, enhancing their ability to meet them.