Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 27, 2025
Force System with Vertical V-Bends: A 3D In Vitro Assessment of Elastic and Rigid Rectangular Archwires
Published on: July 24, 2018
Comparative study of biomechanical effects between two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing a rocking-chair archwire:
Shaotai Wang1,2, Min Hu3,4, Sihan Wang1,2
1Department of Orthodontics, Hospital of Stomatology, Jilin University, Changchun, 130021, China.
Objectives:
After bonding brackets to the first deciduous molar in a 2 × 4 technique, a three-dimensional finite element analysis (3D FEA) is used to demonstrate the biomechanical changes in an orthodontic system. This study aims to opt for the appropriate type of orthodontic technology by analyzing and comparing the mechanical systems produced by two types of 2 × 4 techniques employing rocking-chair archwires.
Materials And Methods:
Herein, the maxilla and maxillary dentition are modeled by cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) and 3D FEA. Common clinically used 0.016-inch round archwires (material: titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless-steel) and 0.018-inch round archwires (material: titanium-molybdenum alloy and stainless-steel) are bent into the shape of a rocking chair with a depth of 3 mm. The forces and moments applied to the brackets are transferred to the dentition to evaluate the biomechanical effects of the 2 × 4 technique after the bracket is bonded to the first deciduous molar.
Results:
For the central incisor, the teeth-moving distance in all three directions increases with bracket bonding to the first deciduous molar applying the 0.016-inch rocking-chair archwire. For the lateral incisor, the tooth root moves toward the gingival side when using 0.016-inch and 0.018-inch archwires. Moreover, for the same archwire size, the lateral incisors move toward the gingival side by bonding the bracket to the first deciduous molar. After bonding a bracket to the first deciduous molar, using rocking-chair archwires of 0.016 inch or 0.018 inch, the buccal movement distance of the first molar crown increases in the X-axis direction. In the Y-axis and Z-axis directions, the modified 2 × 4 technique significantly increases the effect of backward-tipping compared with the traditional 2 × 4 technique.
Conclusions:
In clinical practice, the modified 2 × 4 technique can be used to increase the movement distance of anterior teeth to a certain extent and accelerate the orthodontic teeth movement. Moreover, the modified 2 × 4 technique is better in anchorage conservation of the first molar than the traditional technique.
Clinical Relevance:
Although the traditional 2 × 4 technique is widely used in early orthodontic treatment, we found mucosal damage and abnormal archwire deformation might affect orthodontic treatment time and effect. The modified 2 × 4 technique is a novel approach that avoids these drawbacks and improves orthodontic treatment efficiency.
