Subjective memory measures: Metamemory questionnaires currently in use.

Area of Science:

• Cognitive Psychology
• Neuroscience
• Gerontology

Background:

• Subjective memory evaluation is crucial for assessing memory abilities and complaints alongside objective measures.
• Questionnaires are widely used in research and clinical settings to gauge perceived memory ability, memory complaints, and memory beliefs.
• A significant debate exists regarding the accuracy of subjective evaluations in reflecting actual memory performance, highlighting a disconnect between subjective and objective memory measures.

Approach:

• This review examines three categories of metamemory questionnaires: self-efficacy, complaints, and multidimensional questionnaires.
• It analyzes factors influencing self-evaluation of memory, including knowledge, beliefs, evaluative ability, recent experiences, and affect.
• The relationship between subjective and objective memory measures is explored to understand their concordance and discordance.

Key Points:

• Metamemory questionnaires offer a structured approach to self-reported memory but may not perfectly align with objective memory performance.
• Factors such as memory knowledge, beliefs, and emotional state can influence how individuals perceive their own memory.
• Understanding the interplay between subjective and objective memory is essential for accurate assessment.

Conclusions:

• The review highlights the benefits and limitations of current metamemory questionnaires.
• It provides considerations for the future development and application of these tools in research and clinical practice.
• Further research is needed to bridge the gap between subjective and objective memory assessments.