Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Competing-Risk Nomogram for Predicting Cancer-Specific Survival in Multiple Primary Colorectal Cancer Patients after Surgery
Published on: September 27, 2024
Gender Effects on the Impact of Colorectal Cancer Risk Calculators on Screening Intentions: Experimental Study
Jungmin Lee1, Mark Keil1, Jong Seok Lee2
1J Mack Robinson College of Business, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) risk calculators increase screening intentions in men but decrease them in women by affecting perceived susceptibility. Patients should not solely rely on these tools for screening decisions.
Area of Science:
- Oncology
- Health Behavior Research
- Medical Informatics
Background:
- Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a leading cause of cancer death in the US, yet screening rates lag behind other cancers.
- Risk calculators aim to boost awareness and screening compliance, but their impact on intention is not well understood.
- Existing research shows inconsistent effects of CRC risk calculators, with some indicating reduced risk perception.
Purpose of the Study:
- To investigate how using CRC risk calculators influences individuals' intentions to undergo CRC screening.
- To explore perceived susceptibility to CRC as a mediator of this influence.
- To examine gender-based differences in the effect of CRC risk calculators on screening intentions.
Main Methods:
- 128 US-based participants (45-85 years, insured) were recruited via Amazon Mechanical Turk.
- Participants were randomized to receive immediate CRC risk calculator results (treatment) or delayed results (control).
- Data collected included demographics, perceived CRC susceptibility, and screening intention.
Main Results:
- CRC risk calculators positively impacted screening intentions in men.
- In women, calculator use negatively affected perceived susceptibility, subsequently lowering screening intentions.
- Gender significantly moderated the relationship between perceived susceptibility and CRC screening intention.
Conclusions:
- CRC risk calculators can enhance screening intentions in men but decrease them in women.
- The differential impact is mediated by gender-specific changes in perceived susceptibility.
- While informative, CRC risk calculators should not be the sole basis for screening decisions.
Related Concept Videos
Types of Biopharmaceutical Studies: Controlled and Non-Controlled Approaches
Non-controlled studies, commonly employed for initial exploration, lack a control group, rendering them susceptible to biases and external influences. In contrast,...
Study Designs in Epidemiology
Observational studies are those where the researcher does not intervene but rather observes natural variations. They include cross-sectional, cohort, and...
Cancer Prevention
Some...
Bias in Epidemiological Studies
Cancer Survival Analysis
Regression Toward the Mean

