Evaluating variation in pre-operative evaluation and planning for children undergoing atrial or ventricular septal

Catherine C Dawson-Gore1,2, Andrew Well1,3,4, Scott Wallace4

  • 1Texas Center for Pediatric and Congenital Heart Disease, UT Health Austin / Dell Children's Medical Center, AustinTX, USA.

PubMed

Insights

Significant variation exists in pre-operative care for children undergoing congenital heart defect (CHD) repair. This variability in evaluating atrial septal defect (ASD) and ventricular septal defect (VSD) may impact patient outcomes and healthcare costs.

Area of Science:

  • Pediatric Cardiology
  • Congenital Heart Surgery
  • Healthcare Process Improvement

Background:

  • Congenital heart defect (CHD) care is resource-intensive, with unwarranted variation potentially increasing costs and negatively impacting health outcomes.
  • This study investigates process variation in the pre-operative evaluation and planning for pediatric atrial septal defect (ASD) and ventricular septal defect (VSD) surgical repair.
  • Hypothesizes that significant variation exists within this pre-operative process, particularly at key care points.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To identify and characterize variations in the pre-operative evaluation and planning process for pediatric ASD and VSD surgical repair.
  • To assess the extent of variability at specific points within the pre-operative pathway.
  • To lay the groundwork for future research into the impact of these variations on outcomes and costs.

Main Methods:

  • Constructed an initial process map based on interviews with integrated congenital heart center staff.
  • Revised the process map using a retrospective chart review of 32 patients undergoing isolated surgical ASD or VSD repair between July 2018 and November 2020.
  • Assessed the revised process map for points of consistency and variability.

Main Results:

  • Ten patients (31%) underwent interventional cardiology review prior to surgical evaluation, with reasons including failed catheter-based closure (60%) or ineligibility (40%).
  • While initial interviews suggested surgery rescheduling as a major variability, chart review indicated pre-operative interventional cardiology review was a more prominent source of variation.
  • Most patients (94%) were reviewed in case conference, attended surgical clinic, and were not admitted prior to surgery.

Conclusions:

  • Significant variability was identified in the pre-operative evaluation and planning for pediatric ASD/VSD surgical repair.
  • This process variation may contribute to previously documented variations in outcomes and costs within CHD surgery.
  • Future research should determine if identified variations are warranted and quantify their impact on health outcomes and costs.
Abstract