Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025
Diffusion Tensor Magnetic Resonance Imaging in Chronic Spinal Cord Compression
Published on: May 7, 2019
Application of Magnetic Resonance Diffusion Tensor Imaging in Diagnosis of Lumbosacral Nerve Root Compression
Haiyan Cheng1, Honglin Lan1, Yuanyuan Bao1
1Department of MRI room, Jincheng People's Hospital, No.456, Wenchang East Road, Jincheng City, Shanxi Province 048026, China
Objective:
The aim of this study was to assess the value of 3.0T magnetic resonance (MR) Diffusion tensor imaging (DTI) in the diagnosis of lumbosacral nerve root compression.
Methods:
The radiology reports, and clinical records of 34 patients with nerve root compression caused by lumbar disc herniation or bulging and 21 healthy volunteers who had undergone magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and DTI scan were retrospectively reviewed. The differences in fractional anisotropy (FA) and apparent diffusion coefficient (ADC) between compressed and non-compressed nerve roots from patients and the normal nerve roots from healthy volunteers were compared. Meanwhile, the nerve root fiber bundles were observed and analyzed.
Results:
The average FA and ADC values of the compressed nerve roots were 0.254 ± 0.307 and 1.892 ± 0.346 10^-3mm2/s, respectively. The average FA and ADC values of the non-compressed nerve roots were 0.377 ± 0.659 and 1.353 ± 0.344 10^-3mm2/s, respectively. The FA value of compressed nerve roots was significantly lower than that of non-compressed nerve roots (P < 0.01). The ADC value of compressed nerve roots was significantly higher than that of non-compressed nerve roots. There were no significant differences between the left and right nerve roots of normal volunteers in FA and ADC values (P > 0.05). The nerve roots at different levels of L3-S1 had significantly different FA and ADC values (P < 0.01). Incomplete fiber bundles with extrusion deformation, displacement or partial defect were observed in the compressed nerve root fiber bundles. The real diagnosis of the clinical situation of the nerve can provide neuroscientists with an important computer tool to help them infer and understand the possible working mechanism from the experimental data of behavior and electrophysiology.
Conclusion:
The compressed lumbosacral nerve roots can be accurately localized through 3.0T magnetic resonance DTI, which is instructive for accurate clinical diagnosis and preoperative localization.
