Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Clinical outcomes of conservative, endovascular and microsurgical management of unruptured giant intracranial aneurysms: 3-year follow-up of the prospective, multinational Giant Intracranial Aneurysm Registry.

Journal of neurology, neurosurgery, and psychiatry·2026
Same author

Clinical Relevance of Early Cranial Computed Tomography-Imaging After Elective Brain Tumor Surgery in Children and Adolescents.

Neurosurgery·2026
Same author

Rethinking the role of surgery and radiotherapy in BRAF-mutant papillary craniopharyngioma: a position statement from the neurosurgical perspective.

Neurosurgical focus·2026
Same author

Correction to: Surgical screening protocol for craniocervical instability secondary to ehlers-danlos syndrome and other connective tissue disorders: analysis of a 347 patient case series.

Neurosurgical review·2026
Same author

Prospective analysis of salivary melatonin levels in patients with symptomatic pineal cysts.

Acta neurochirurgica·2026
Same author

Bilateral functional hippocampectomy following recurrent bacterial meningitis: a case report.

Journal of medical case reports·2026

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
06:24

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement

Published on: May 11, 2020

8.9K

Robot-assisted spinal augmentation procedures: is it worth the increased effort?

Christoph Bettag1, Tim Jann1, Veit Rohde1

  • 1Department of Neurosurgery, University Hospital Göttingen, Georg August University of Goettingen, Göttingen, Germany.

European Spine Journal : Official Publication of the European Spine Society, the European Spinal Deformity Society, and the European Section of the Cervical Spine Research Society
|June 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Robot assistance for spinal augmentation procedures (SAP) did not show superiority over traditional fluoroscopy guidance. This comparative study found no significant differences in accuracy, radiation exposure, or complication rates between the two methods for vertebral compression fractures.

Keywords:
ComplicationsOsteoporosisRobot-assisted spine surgerySpinal augmentation procedure

More Related Videos

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
05:57

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.4K
Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
05:42

Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.6K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement
06:24

A Spine Robotic-Assisted Navigation System for Pedicle Screw Placement

Published on: May 11, 2020

8.9K
A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique
05:57

A Teleoperated Robotic System-Assisted Percutaneous Transiliac-Transsacral Screw Fixation Technique

Published on: January 6, 2023

2.4K
Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture
05:42

Orthopedic Robot-Assisted Femoral Neck System in the Treatment of Femoral Neck Fracture

Published on: March 3, 2023

2.6K

Area of Science:

  • Minimally Invasive Surgery
  • Orthopedic Surgery
  • Robotics in Medicine

Background:

  • Spinal augmentation procedures (SAPs) are standard treatments for vertebral compression fractures, often performed percutaneously.
  • Anatomical challenges like small pedicles or kyphotic deformities can complicate percutaneous SAPs, increasing risks.
  • Robot assistance is explored to enhance trajectory precision and reduce complications in these procedures.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To compare the efficacy and safety of robot-assisted percutaneous SAPs versus conventional fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous SAPs.
  • To evaluate accuracy, radiation exposure, and complication rates between the two techniques.
  • To assess the impact of robot assistance on surgical outcomes for vertebral compression fractures.

Main Methods:

  • Retrospective observational analysis of 130 procedures (94 patients).
  • Comparison of demographic parameters, procedural data (radiation dosage, cement volume), pedicular trajectory precision, and complications.
  • Statistical analysis of surgical duration, radiation exposure, cement volume, and trajectory deviation.

Main Results:

  • No significant differences in demographic parameters or clinically relevant complications between robot-assisted and fluoroscopy-guided groups.
  • Robot-assisted procedures had a significantly longer duration of surgery (p < 0.001).
  • Intraoperative radiation exposure and injected cement volume were similar; no significant difference in pedicle trajectory deviation was observed.

Conclusions:

  • Robot assistance in spinal augmentation procedures does not appear to offer superior accuracy, radiation safety, or reduced complication rates compared to fluoroscopy-guided SAPs.
  • Current evidence suggests fluoroscopy-guided percutaneous SAPs remain a viable and effective standard of care.
  • Further research may be needed to identify specific patient populations or scenarios where robot assistance could provide a distinct advantage.