Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025
Transcanalicular Diode Laser-assisted Dacryocystorhinostomy for the Treatment of Primary Acquired Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction
Published on: October 13, 2017
Short-Term Outcomes of Hydrus Microstent With and Without Additional Canaloplasty During Cataract Surgery
Anna Dickinson1,2, Luke Leidy1,2, Omar Nusair2,3
1Eastern Virginia Medical School, Norfolk, VA.
PréCis:
Compared with phacoemulsification and microstent alone, we observed that phacoemulsification with combined microstent and canaloplasty resulted in a significantly greater reduction in glaucoma medications while maintaining similar rates of intraocular pressure reduction and low complications.
Purpose:
The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of phacoemulsification combined with Hydrus Microstent (Alcon Inc.) implantation alone or in combination with canaloplasty (OMNI Surgical System, Sight Sciences Inc.).
Materials And Methods:
Retrospective study of mild-to-moderate primary open angle glaucoma patients who underwent phacoemulsification with microstent alone (42 eyes of 42 patients) or in combination with canaloplasty (canaloplasty-microstent, 32 eyes of 32 patients). The mean number of ocular hypotensive medications and intraocular pressure were assessed preoperatively and postoperatively at 1 week and at 1, 3, and 6 months. Complications and secondary surgical interventions were recorded. Outcomes measures included the percentage of unmedicated eyes and surgical success at 6 months. Surgical success was defined as reaching the target intraocular pressure without medications or secondary surgical interventions.
Results:
Mean intraocular pressure at 6 months was 14.1±3.5 mm Hg (13% reduction) after microstent alone and 13.6±3.1 mm Hg (17% reduction) after canaloplasty-microstent. Mean medications at 6 months were 0.57±0.9 (67% reduction) after microstent alone and 0.16±0.4 (88% reduction) after canaloplasty-microstent ( P< 0.05). At 6 months, 64.3% of microstent alone and 87.3% of canaloplasty-microstent were off all medications ( P =0.02). Success probabilities at 6 months were 44.5% for microstent alone and 70.0% for canaloplasty-microstent ( P =0.04). No secondary surgical interventions occurred in either group.
Conclusions:
Microstent combined with canaloplasty resulted in a significantly higher rate of medication-free status compared with microstent alone through 6 months.
