Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Social Loafing01:37

Social Loafing

34.8K
Another way in which a group presence can affect performance is social loafing—the exertion of less effort by a person working together with a group. Social loafing occurs when our individual performance cannot be evaluated separately from the group. Thus, group performance declines on easy tasks (Karau & Williams, 1993). Essentially individual group members loaf and let other group members pick up the slack. Because each individual’s efforts cannot be evaluated,...
34.8K
Working Memory01:24

Working Memory

389
Working memory refers to a combination of components, including short-term memory and attention, that allow an individual to hold information temporarily as we perform cognitive tasks. It is an essential cognitive function that enables the execution of complex tasks such as problem-solving, comprehension, and reasoning. Unlike short-term memory, which simply involves the storage of information for a brief period, working memory involves the active manipulation and processing of this...
389
Social Facilitation01:04

Social Facilitation

32.0K
Not all intergroup interactions lead to negative outcomes. Sometimes, being in a group situation can improve performance. Social facilitation occurs when an individual performs better when an audience is watching than when the individual performs the behavior alone. This typically occurs when people are performing a task for which they are skilled.
32.0K
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness01:19

High-Level and Low-Level Awareness

295
Controlled processes in human consciousness represent high-alert mental states where individuals deliberately focus their attention on achieving specific goals. Controlled processes can be seen in situations like mastering new technology, where a person might become so absorbed that they ignore surrounding distractions. Such processes involve selective attention, requiring one to concentrate on particular elements of experience while disregarding others. These are governed by executive...
295
Nonconscious Mimicry01:13

Nonconscious Mimicry

4.6K
Nonconscious mimicry occurs when individuals alter their mannerisms to match the behaviors and expressions of those nearby, without intention.
4.6K
Cognitive Learning01:21

Cognitive Learning

442
Cognitive learning is based on purposive behavior, incidental learning, and insight learning.
E. C. Tolman's theory of purposive behavior emphasizes that much behavior is goal-directed. He argued that to understand behavior, we must look at the entire sequence of actions leading to a goal. For instance, high school students study hard, not just due to past reinforcement but also to achieve the goal of getting into a good college.
Tolman introduced the idea that behavior is influenced by...
442

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Can I believe my voice? Self-similarity and the illusory truth effect.

Cognition·2026
Same author

No error on the side of safety: No representational momentum for auditory looming stimuli.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same author

Influence of solution efficiency and valence of instruction on additive and subtractive solution strategies in humans, GPT-4, and GPT-4o.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Not proportional after all: Investigating speed perception with the beep-speed illusion.

Attention, perception & psychophysics·2026
Same author

How online studies must increase their defences against AI.

Communications psychology·2026
Same author

Correction: The Open Anchoring Quest Dataset: Anchored Estimates from 96 Studies on Anchoring Effects.

Journal of open psychology data·2025
Same journal

Mind wandering during first- and foreign-language reading.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Lexical word processing is unaffected by rapid invisible frequency tagging in reading: Evidence from eye movements.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Anxiety modulates voluntary attentional orienting to emotional gaze cues: Eye movements for pro- and anti-saccades.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Faster key-press responses to front vowels than back vowels when matching heard vowels with represented vowels.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

Testing the interleaving effect without response bias: A forced-choice reevaluation of Kornell and Bjork (2008).

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
Same journal

The impact of social interaction on abstract concepts.

Psychonomic bulletin & review·2026
See all related articles

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 26, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

776

Mutual interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task performance.

Sandra Grinschgl1,2, Frank Papenmeier3, Hauke S Meyerhoff4,5

  • 1Department of Psychology, University of Graz, Universitätsplatz 2, 8010, Graz, Austria. sandra.grinschgl@uni-graz.at.

Psychonomic Bulletin & Review
|June 13, 2023
PubMed
Summary
This summary is machine-generated.

Modern tools enable cognitive offloading, the externalization of cognitive processes. This study shows that increased cognitive offloading improves performance on concurrent tasks, especially under demanding conditions.

Keywords:
Cognitive offloadingDual-taskSecondary task performanceWorking memory

More Related Videos

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.0K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 26, 2025

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies
08:24

The Joint Effect of Social Comparison and Social Distance on Evaluation of Intertemporal Choice Outcomes in Event-related Potential Studies

Published on: August 25, 2023

776
Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen
07:52

Revised and Neuroimaging-Compatible Versions of the Dual Task Screen

Published on: October 5, 2020

3.6K
Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients
07:42

Dual-Task Stroop Paradigm for Detecting Cognitive Deficits in High-Functioning Stroke Patients

Published on: December 16, 2022

3.0K

Area of Science:

  • Cognitive Psychology
  • Human-Computer Interaction
  • Neuroscience

Background:

  • Modern technology, like smartphones, facilitates cognitive offloading, allowing individuals to externalize cognitive processes.
  • Daily life often involves demanding situations requiring concurrent task performance, mirroring complex cognitive loads.
  • Understanding cognitive offloading's role in multitasking is crucial for optimizing human performance.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To investigate the use and consequences of cognitive offloading in demanding dual-task situations.
  • To examine the impact of offloading behavior on performance in a concurrent secondary task.
  • To explore the interplay between cognitive offloading and secondary task demands.

Main Methods:

  • A preregistered study adapted a dual-task paradigm, incorporating a primary pattern copy task allowing variable cognitive offloading.
  • Temporal costs associated with offloading were manipulated.
  • Participants (N=172) performed the primary task concurrently with a secondary N-back task (in half the conditions).

Main Results:

  • Increased cognitive offloading correlated with more accurate performance on the secondary N-back task when temporal costs were absent.
  • The requirement to perform the secondary N-back task led to increased offloading behavior.
  • A significant interplay was observed between offloading frequency and secondary task demands.

Conclusions:

  • Cognitive offloading is actively employed in demanding, multitasking environments.
  • Utilizing cognitive offloading frees up internal cognitive resources, enhancing performance on concurrent tasks.
  • This suggests a dynamic resource allocation strategy where offloading supports performance under cognitive load.