Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025
Generation of a Rat Model of Acute Liver Failure by Combining 70% Partial Hepatectomy and Acetaminophen
Published on: November 27, 2019
Transcriptome analysis of hepatic injury caused by delayed resuscitation following severe burns in rats
Zhaoxing Liu1, Dawei Li, Jianqiu Yang
1From the Medical School of Chinese PLA (Z.L., D.L., B.Z.); and Department of Burns and Plastic Surgery (Z.L., D.L., J.Y., X.L., B.Z., Y.Z., W.Z., Y.S., Y.N., C.S.), the Fourth Medical Centre, Chinese PLA General Hospital, Beijing, China.
Background:
Delayed resuscitation (DR) can induce hepatic reperfusion injury after severe burns. The underlying molecular mechanisms of DR-induced hepatic injury remain unidentified. This study sought to predict candidate genes and molecular pathways in a DR-induced hepatic injury preclinical model.
Methods:
Rats were randomized into three groups: the sham injury (Sham) group; the DR group, which had third-degree burns covering 30% of the body surface area and DR; and the early resuscitation (ER) group, in which ER was administered. The liver tissue was harvested for the purpose of evaluating hepatic injury and performing transcriptome sequencing. Differentially expressed genes (DEGs) for DR versus Sham and ER versus DR were analyzed respectively. Gene Ontology, Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes, and Ingenuity Pathway Analysis were used. The DEGs and critical module genes were intersected to obtain critical genes. Immune infiltration and competing endogenous RNA networks were also analyzed. Validation was conducted using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction.
Results:
Hepatic injury was evident in DR rats. There were 2,430 DEGs between DR and Sham and 261 DEGs between ER and DR. Differentially expressed genes were mostly enriched in metabolic process for DR versus Sham, and immune and inflammatory processes for ER versus DR. Four critical genes (Tff3, C1galt1, Cd48, and MGC105649) were obtained by screening. Five immune cells were significantly different between DR and Sham, and seven immune cells were significantly different between ER and DR in immunoassays. Three critical genes, 75 miRNAs, 7 lncRNAs, and 197 edges constituted the mRNA-miRNA-lncRNA linkages, which included C1galt1-rno-miR-330-5p-Pvt1, among others.
Conclusion:
This is the first attempt to perform a high-throughput analysis of gene expression profiles in DR-induced hepatic injury. It shows that immunity and inflammation-related RNAs and pathways play an important role in the progression of hepatic injury. It also provides insight into some important RNAs and regulatory targets related to disease.
