Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 26, 2025

Utilizing Electroencephalography Measurements for Comparison of Task-Specific Neural Efficiencies: Spatial Intelligence Tasks
Published on: August 9, 2016
Not so smart? "Smart" drugs increase the level but decrease the quality of cognitive effort
Elizabeth Bowman1, David Coghill2, Carsten Murawski1
1Centre for Brain, Mind, and Markets, University of Melbourne, Parkville, Victoria 3010, Australia.
Pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers like methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil did not improve performance on complex tasks. These "smart drugs" increased effort but decreased the quality of problem-solving, annulling motivational benefits.
Area of Science:
- Cognitive Neuroscience
- Behavioral Economics
- Psychopharmacology
Background:
- The efficacy of pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers in complex, real-world tasks is not well-established.
- Existing research often focuses on simple cognitive functions, not complex problem-solving.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the impact of common cognitive enhancers on performance in a complex optimization task.
- To determine if drugs like methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil enhance or impair performance in tasks requiring strategic decision-making.
Main Methods:
- Utilized the knapsack optimization problem as a model for complex daily tasks.
- Compared the effects of methylphenidate, dextroamphetamine, and modafinil against a placebo.
- Measured task value, solution optimality, decision time, steps taken, and productivity.
Main Results:
- Cognitive enhancers significantly diminished the value attained in the knapsack task compared to placebo.
- While motivation may increase, the quality of effort and problem-solving strategy decreased significantly.
- Individual performance differences were reduced, with high performers declining and low performers improving.
Conclusions:
- Pharmaceutical cognitive enhancers do not enhance performance on complex optimization tasks.
- The observed decrease in the quality of effort negates any potential motivational benefits of these drugs.
- Increased randomness in solution strategies may explain the counterintuitive performance changes.
More Related Videos
07:42An Automated T-maze Based Apparatus and Protocol for Analyzing Delay- and Effort-based Decision Making in Free Moving Rodents
Published on: August 2, 2018
07:02A Computerized Test Battery to Study Pharmacodynamic Effects on the Central Nervous System of Cholinergic Drugs in Early Phase Drug Development
Published on: February 11, 2019
Related Concept Videos
Cognitive Enhancers: Cholinesterase Inhibitors and NMDA Receptor Antagonists
Stimulants
Cocaine can be administered via snorting, injection, or smoking. It primarily functions by blocking the reuptake of dopamine, resulting in a euphoric high characterized by an intense sensation of happiness and...
CNS Stimulants: Cocaine, Amphetamines and Cannabinoids
An Overview of Psychoactive Drugs
Stimulants such as cocaine, amphetamines, and nicotine enhance brain activity, leading to increased alertness, attention, and energy. These drugs typically raise heart rate, blood pressure, and body temperature. While they can induce feelings of euphoria, their misuse can result in severe health...
CNS Stimulants: Psychedelic Agents
High-Level and Low-Level Awareness