Related Experiment Video
Updated: Aug 13, 2026

08:20
Author Spotlight: AI-Driven Trypanosome Species Detection from Microscopic Images
Published on: October 27, 2023
1.5K
Automated grading of anatomical objective structured practical examinations using decision trees: An artificial
Jason Bernard1, Ranil Sonnadara1, Anthony N Saraco2
1Department of Surgery, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada.
Anatomical Sciences Education
|June 16, 2023
Summary
Decision Trees (DTs) accurately graded Objective Structured Practical Examinations (OSPEs) in anatomy and physiology, achieving 94.49% accuracy. This demonstrates DTs
Area of Science:
- Medical Education
- Artificial Intelligence
- Anatomy and Physiology
Background:
- Objective Structured Practical Examinations (OSPEs) are effective for assessing anatomical knowledge but are resource-intensive.
- Traditional OSPEs often use short-answer or fill-in-the-blank questions, requiring significant human grading resources.
- Online anatomy and physiology courses may reduce students' opportunities for OSPE practice.
Purpose of the Study:
- To evaluate the accuracy of Decision Trees (DTs) in grading OSPE questions.
- To establish a foundation for an intelligent, online OSPE tutoring system.
Main Methods:
- Utilized OSPE data from McMaster University's anatomy and physiology course (Winter 2020).
- Trained a Decision Tree (DT) for each of the 54 OSPE questions using 90% of the dataset via 10-fold validation.
- DTs were trained on unique words from correct student answers and used to grade the remaining 10% of the data.
Main Results:
- Decision Trees (DTs) achieved an average accuracy of 94.49% across all 54 OSPE questions.
- DT grading accuracy was comparable to that of human staff and faculty.
Conclusions:
- Machine learning algorithms, specifically DTs, are highly effective for OSPE grading.
- DTs show significant potential for developing intelligent, online OSPE tutoring systems.

