Related Experiment Video
Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Postconditioning with Lactate-enriched Blood for Cardioprotection in ST-segment Elevation Myocardial Infarction
Published on: May 28, 2019
Different hydration methods for the prevention of contrast-induced nephropathy in patients with elective percutaneous
Fei Chen1, Jingchao Lu1, Xiuchun Yang1
1Department of Cardiology, the Second Hospital of Hebei Medical University and the Institute of Cardiocerebrovascular Disease of Hebei Province, Shijiazhuang, 050000, China.
Insights
Postprocedure hydration is as effective as preprocedure hydration for preventing contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). This finding supports similar safety and efficacy for both hydration strategies in cardiac procedures.
Area of Science:
- Cardiology
- Nephrology
- Radiology
Background:
- Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) is a significant concern following cardiac procedures.
- Hydration is the primary method for CIN prevention.
- The optimal timing of hydration (pre- vs. postprocedure) remains debated.
Purpose of the Study:
- To compare the effectiveness of preprocedure versus postprocedure hydration in preventing CIN.
- To evaluate CIN incidence and adverse events in patients undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Main Methods:
- Retrospective study with propensity score matching.
- Comparison of 198 postprocedure hydration cases with 396 preprocedure hydration cases.
- Analysis of CIN incidence at 48 hours and major adverse events within 30 days post-PCI.
Main Results:
- CIN incidence was 3.54% in the postprocedure group and 4.8% in the preprocedure group (p = 0.478), showing no significant difference.
- Major adverse events were similar between groups (3.03% vs. 2.02%, p = 0.830).
- Independent risk factors for CIN included diabetes, baseline BNP and cystatin C, and contrast agent dosage.
Conclusions:
- Postprocedure hydration is an effective alternative to preprocedure hydration for CIN prevention in elective PCI.
- Both hydration strategies demonstrate comparable efficacy and safety profiles.
Background:
Hydration is currently the main measure to prevent contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN). We aimed to compare the preventive effect of preprocedure and postprocedure hydration on CIN in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
Methods:
A retrospective study included 198 cases of postprocedure hydration and 396 cases of preprocedure hydration using propensity score matching. The incidence of CIN 48 h after PCI and adverse events within 30 days after contrast media exposure were compared between the two groups. Logistic regression analysis was used to analyse the risk factors for CIN.
Results:
The incidence of CIN in the postprocedure hydration group was 3.54%, while that in the preprocedure hydration group was 4.8%. There was no significant difference between the two groups (p = 0.478). Multivariate logistic regression analysis showed that diabetes mellitus, baseline BNP and cystatin C levels, and contrast agent dosage were independent risk factors for CIN. There was no significant difference in the incidence of major adverse events between the two groups (3.03% vs. 2.02%, p = 0.830).
Conclusions:
Postprocedure hydration is equally effective compared to preoperative hydration in the prevention of CIN in patients with coronary heart disease undergoing elective PCI.
Related Concept Videos
Cardiac Catheterization I: Pre-Procedure Overview
Cardiac Catheterization IV: Nursing Management
Imaging Studies VII: Vascular Imaging
Imaging Studies for Cardiovascular System V: CT
Acute Kidney Injury IV: Diagnostic Studies and Prevention
Imaging Studies III: Computed Tomography

