Jove
Visualize
Contact Us
JoVE
x logofacebook logolinkedin logoyoutube logo
ABOUT JoVE
OverviewLeadershipBlogJoVE Help Center
AUTHORS
Publishing ProcessEditorial BoardScope & PoliciesPeer ReviewFAQSubmit
LIBRARIANS
TestimonialsSubscriptionsAccessResourcesLibrary Advisory BoardFAQ
RESEARCH
JoVE JournalMethods CollectionsJoVE Encyclopedia of ExperimentsArchive
EDUCATION
JoVE CoreJoVE BusinessJoVE Science EducationJoVE Lab ManualFaculty Resource CenterFaculty Site
Terms & Conditions of Use
Privacy Policy
Policies

Related Concept Videos

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)01:22

Spin–Spin Coupling: Three-Bond Coupling (Vicinal Coupling)

1.1K
Vicinal or three-bond coupling is commonly observed between protons attached to adjacent carbons. Here, nuclear spin information is primarily transferred via electron spin interactions between adjacent C‑H bond orbitals. This generally favors the antiparallel arrangement of spins, so 3J values are usually positive.
The extent of coupling depends on the C‑C bond length, the two H‑C‑C angles, any electron-withdrawing substituents, and the dihedral angle between the...
1.1K
NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling01:08

NMR Spectroscopy: Spin–Spin Coupling

1.5K
The spin state of an NMR-active nucleus can have a slight effect on its immediate electronic environment. This effect propagates through the intervening bonds and affects the electronic environments of NMR-active nuclei up to three bonds away; occasionally, even farther. This phenomenon is called spin–spin coupling or J-coupling. Coupling interactions are mutual and result in small changes in the absorption frequencies of both nuclei involved. While nuclei of the same element are involved...
1.5K
Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling01:17

Spin–Spin Coupling: One-Bond Coupling

1.0K
Coupling interactions are strongest between NMR-active nuclei bonded to each other, where spin information can be transmitted directly through the pair of bonding electrons. While nuclei polarize their electrons to the opposite spins, the bonding electron pair has opposite spins. Configurations with antiparallel nuclear spins are expected to be lower in energy. When coupling makes antiparallel states more favorable, J is considered to have a positive value. The one-bond coupling constant, 1J,...
1.0K
Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)01:20

Spin–Spin Coupling: Two-Bond Coupling (Geminal Coupling)

1.1K
Two NMR-active nuclei bonded to a central atom can be involved in geminal or two-bond coupling. Geminal coupling is commonly seen between diastereotopic protons in chiral molecules and unsymmetrical alkenes, among others.
The central atom need not be NMR-active because its electrons are affected by the electron polarization of the spin-active atoms. However, spin information is transmitted less effectively than in one-bond coupling, and 2J values are usually weaker than 1J values. The energy of...
1.1K
Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview01:08

Spin–Spin Coupling Constant: Overview

961
In bromoethane, the three methyl protons are coupled to the two methylene protons that are three bonds away. In accordance with the n+1 rule, the signal from the methyl protons is split into three peaks with 1:2:1 relative intensities. The methylene protons appear as a quartet, with the relative intensities of 1:3:3:1.
Qualitatively, any spin plus-half nucleus polarizes the spins of its electrons to the minus-half state. Consequently, the paired electron in the hydrogen–carbon bond must...
961
¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals01:02

¹H NMR: Interpreting Distorted and Overlapping Signals

1.1K
Spin systems where the difference in chemical shifts of the coupled nuclei is greater than ten times J are called first-order spin systems. These nuclei are weakly coupled, and their chemical shifts and coupling constant can generally be estimated from the well-separated signals in the spectrum.
As Δν decreases and the signals move closer, the doublets appear increasingly distorted. The intensities of the inner lines increase at the cost of those of the outer lines as the signals are...
1.1K

You might also read

Related Articles

Articles linked to this work by shared authors, journal, and citation graph.

Sort by
Same author

Spectroscopic evidence for a first-order transition to a possible orbital Fulde-Ferrell-Larkin-Ovchinnikov state.

Nature communications·2026
Same author

Unconventional superconductivity in the presence of long-range interactions in transition metal dichalcogenide moiré heterobilayers.

Scientific reports·2026
Same author

Multi-Orbital Charge Transfer into Nonplanar Cycloarenes Revealed with CO-Functionalized STM Tips.

The journal of physical chemistry letters·2026
Same author

Doping-induced magnetic phase transition enables all-electrical spin control in CrSBr.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Nature of 2D XY antiferromagnetism in a van der Waals monolayer.

Nature communications·2025
Same author

Systematic modulation of charge and spin in graphene nanoribbons on MgO.

Nature communications·2025

Related Experiment Video

Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.0K

Determining spin-orbit coupling in graphene by quasiparticle interference imaging.

Lihuan Sun1, Louk Rademaker1,2, Diego Mauro1,3

  • 1Department of Quantum Matter Physics, University of Geneva, 1211, Geneva, Switzerland.

Nature Communications
|June 24, 2023
PubMed
Summary

Researchers quantified spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in graphene-on-WSe2 using quasiparticle interference imaging. This method reveals significant Rashba and valley-Zeeman SOC terms, crucial for topological states and spintronics.

More Related Videos

Fabrication of Gate-tunable Graphene Devices for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies with Coulomb Impurities
11:42

Fabrication of Gate-tunable Graphene Devices for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies with Coulomb Impurities

Published on: July 24, 2015

15.5K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing CryoEM Sample Preparation Using Graphene Monolayer on Microscopy Grids
07:57

Author Spotlight: Enhancing CryoEM Sample Preparation Using Graphene Monolayer on Microscopy Grids

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.9K

Related Experiment Videos

Last Updated: Jul 25, 2025

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser
09:00

Experimental Methods for Spin- and Angle-Resolved Photoemission Spectroscopy Combined with Polarization-Variable Laser

Published on: June 28, 2018

10.0K
Fabrication of Gate-tunable Graphene Devices for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies with Coulomb Impurities
11:42

Fabrication of Gate-tunable Graphene Devices for Scanning Tunneling Microscopy Studies with Coulomb Impurities

Published on: July 24, 2015

15.5K
Author Spotlight: Enhancing CryoEM Sample Preparation Using Graphene Monolayer on Microscopy Grids
07:57

Author Spotlight: Enhancing CryoEM Sample Preparation Using Graphene Monolayer on Microscopy Grids

Published on: November 10, 2023

3.9K

Area of Science:

  • Condensed Matter Physics
  • Materials Science
  • Quantum Mechanics

Background:

  • Controlling spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in graphene is essential for topological states and spintronic devices.
  • Graphene-on-transition metal dichalcogenide heterostructures are promising for inducing SOC, but its magnitude and nature remain debated.

Purpose of the Study:

  • To quantitatively probe and determine the strength of induced spin-orbit coupling (SOC) in graphene-on-WSe2 heterostructures.
  • To establish quasiparticle interference imaging as a viable method for SOC characterization.

Main Methods:

  • Utilizing scanning tunneling microscopy to image quasiparticle interference patterns in graphene-WSe2.
  • Performing theoretical analysis on the Fourier transform of interference images to extract SOC parameters.
  • Comparing results with a control sample (30-degree twist angle) lacking backscattering.

Main Results:

  • The induced SOC comprises valley-Zeeman (λvZ ≈ 2 meV) and Rashba (λR ≈ 15 meV) terms.
  • The measured SOC strength is an order of magnitude larger than theoretical predictions but aligns with prior transport experiments.
  • Absence of backscattering in the 30-degree twisted sample validates the methodology.

Conclusions:

  • Quasiparticle interference imaging provides a quantitative method to determine SOC in graphene heterostructures.
  • The findings offer crucial insights into the mechanisms and strength of SOC in these systems.
  • This technique can guide the development of novel spintronic devices and topological materials.